Samples, Bulk vs. Drill

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Louis W. Cope
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
5
File Size:
135 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1992

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Various methods for sampling placer deposits have been mentioned by Wojcik in Chapter 2. Here, a brief description and comparison of these methods will be given as related to bulk versus drill sampling. The advantages and disadvantages inherent to each will also be given. The means of sampling can be grouped into bulk or drill samples. As a generality, drill samples over a five-foot length will run from I/,, to 1 /, cubic yard, depending on the diameter of the drive shoe on the drill casing. Bulk samples can be expected to be in the range from one to many cubic yards each. SAMPLE METHODS Bulk Bulldozer-dug trenches and dozer or front-end loader pits are two methods to excavate large bulk samples. Smaller bulk samples can be obtained by digging small dimension shafts through the deposit, by hand or caisson-like drills. It is not recommended to split samples by alternate bucket-loads or by other means, as the effect of a nugget falling into one or the other fraction will seriously alter the sample.
Citation

APA: Louis W. Cope  (1992)  Samples, Bulk vs. Drill

MLA: Louis W. Cope Samples, Bulk vs. Drill. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1992.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account