Shaft Sinking And Ramp Excavation, Which Method For What Conditions

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 15
- File Size:
- 740 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1994
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a method for mine planners and engineers to evaluate on a conceptual basis if a shaft or a ramp is most suited for their particular underground access requirements. Mine planners and engineers are often raced with the decision of choosing which method of underground access is best suited for their particular requirement. Underground access can be provided by a shaft, ramp, adit, or slope for either exploration and/or actual production operations. This paper will focus on the construction cost and schedule differences between sinking a shaft and excavating a ramp which are currently the most typical access alternatives used in the western United States. It would be wrong to state that one method is superior to the other in every case. There are many variables to be addressed, and the degree of sensitivity of each of them will eventually dictate which method is the most suited to the particular circumstances. This paper compares the construction cost and schedule or sinking a shaft to excavating a ramp at different depths given different ground and hydrological conditions. This comparison provides mine planners with "rules or thumb" that may be applied to the access selection process.
Citation
APA:
(1994) Shaft Sinking And Ramp Excavation, Which Method For What ConditionsMLA: Shaft Sinking And Ramp Excavation, Which Method For What Conditions. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1994.