Technical Notes - A Note on the Skin Effect

Horner1 and van Everdingen8 ave shown that the pressure drop within the wellbore, as a result of having produced the well at a constant rate q for time t, where t is sufficiently large, is: van Everdingen observed that better agreement between theory and well performance can be obtained if, instead of assuming the permeability is kc everywhere about the well, it is assumed the permeability near the well-bore is substantially reduced as a result of drilling, completion and/or production practices. In order to account for the additional pressure drop he introduced the dimensionless quantity S, the skin effect factor, so that Eq. 1 becomes: Eq. 2 might have also been obtained as follows. Assume a zone of altered permeability k, exists about the well out to a radius r and beyond that the unaltered, external permeability k. The additional pressure drop required to overcome this skin of reduced permeability may be calculated with sufficient accuracy using the incompressible flow equation; for Browns-combe and Collins1 have shown almost no difference between compressible and incompressible steady-state flow, in the vicinity of the wellbore, and the small volume of fluid in the vicinity of the wellbore makes unsteady-state mechanics unnecessary. Then. The sign of this skin pressure drop will be positive or negative depending upon whether the altered permeability k, is smaller or larger, respectively, than the external permeability k... Adding the pressure drop of Eq. 3 to Eq. 1 to find the total pressure drop: Comparing Eq. 4 with Eq. 3 it is seen that the skin effect may be defined by: be determined from pressure build-up tests1,3,4,5,6,7,8 The average permeability kavg including the altered and external permeabilities, can be determined from PI tests, and may be defined approximately on the basis of steady-state flow, as was done by Thomas' in defining the damage factor, by: The productivity ratio is the ratio of the average to the external permeability, kavg/ke or This equation shows that the productivity ratio and the skin effect are not uniquely related, because of the uncertainty in the drainage radius, and also, in many instances, the wellbore radius. Fortunately, they enter in the logarithm. The curves of Fig. I are plots of Eq. 8 for values from 100 to 50,000. The points represent the skin effects and corresponding productivity ratios from a large number of well tests, taken from Fig. 15 of Ref. 5 or Fig. 13 of Ref. 9. While some of the data