Technical Notes - On the Valuation of Relative Permeability

Recently equations have been presented by Rose and Bruce' and by Rose², showing how the relative permeability of a reservoir rock may be determined from the capillary character of the rock. In particular, equations were developed to show the relationship between capillary pressure and the effective permeability to the wetting phase in a poly-phase flow system. The equations are as follows (nomenclature the same as in the Rose and Bruce paper) Rose and Bruce assume that the average length of path (L,), which the wetting fluid follows in flowing through a porous media is independent of the saturation to the wetting phase, so that 1 is a constant dependent only on the k rock, and the permeability to the wetting phase is a function of the saturation and of the capillnry pressure: In measuring the flow of ekctric current through partially saturated core samples, it has been observed that the electrical resistance usually is not a simple linear function of saturation. This fact indicates that the average length of path in the flow of electric current is not independent of saturation, but rather that the tortuosity of the path depends upon the average saturation to the conducting fluid as well as upon the characteristics of the rock. itself. Inasmuch as the flow of fluid and the flow of electric current in many respects are analogous, it may be indicated further that the length of path for fluid also may not be independent of saturation. The following relationship can be derived to express the resistance to flow of electric current through a core sample partially saturated with conductive wetting phase, the non-wetting phase being non-conductive: where L is the average length of path followed by the current in flowing through a length L of partially saturated core, where L is the length of current path when the core is fully saturated, and where Rs and R, are the specific resistivities of the partially saturated and saturated core sample, respectively. It will be noted that R., the specific resistivity of the core sample when S, = 1.0, is equal to the "formation resistivity factor"' multiplied by the specific resistivity of the saturating fluid. If it be assumed that the average lengths of path for fluid flow and for the flow of electric current are the same, then equation (5) may be combined with equations (l), (2) and (3) to give the following relationship: The above equation suggests including a correction for tortuosity when calculating the relative permeability of a reservoir rock to a wetting phase. The correction factor may be obtained from the resistivity-saturation relationship. For instance, the following calcu- lations are obtained for the unconsoli-dated sands described by Leverett Kw Kw Sw R°/Rs Pt/Pc¹ (Calc.) (Obs.) 0.30 0.08 0.88 0.02 0.0 0.40 0.16 0.94 0.06 0.04 0.50 0.27 0.97 0.14 0.11 0.60 0.40 0.98 0.26 0.21 0.70 0.53 0.98 0.39 0.35 0.80 0.68 0.99 0.57 0.54 0.90 0.84 0.99 0.77 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 It will be noted that the agreement between the calculated points and the observed data is rather good. Further investigation of the above method for obtaining relative permeabilities may be merited. For many sands within specified ranges of saturations the following relationship has been found to hold approximately': — =SW"......(7) Rs The exponent n in the above equation has been found to equal two for many sands so that equation (6) reduces to the following: The writer acknowledges the permission of The Texas Co. to submit this note for publication. 1. Walter Rose and W. A. Bruce—Jnl. of Pet. Tech., Vol. 1, No. 5, p. 127 (1949). 2. Walter Rose—Jnl. of Petr. Tech., Vol. 1, No. 5, p. 111 (1949). 3. G. E. Archie— -Trans. AIME, 146, 54 (1942). 4. M. C. Leverett— Trans. AIME, 142, 152 (1941). 5. M. C. Leverett—Trans. AIME, 132, 149 (1939).