Technical Papers and Discussions - Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys - Quenching of 75S Aluminum Alloy (Metals Tech., Aug. 1947, TP 2225) With discussion

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
W. L. Fink L. A. Willey
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
14
File Size:
931 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1949

Abstract

During the war there was introduced a new higher strength aircraft alloy designated 75S.1,2,3 The properties of this alloy assure extensive applications in both military and commercial aircraft. It is therefore important to understand its limitations as well as advantages. The properties of 75.5 alloy in the heat-treated tempers, like those of many other aluminum alloys, are affected by the rate of quenching. In general, low quenching rates tend to cause low strengths and to adversely affect the resistance to corrosion. Commercial quenching procedures are usually sufficiently rapid to permit the development of maximum properties. However, in the center of heavy sections, such as large rolled and extruded shapes, the quenching rates may not be rapid enough to develop maximum strength or resistance to corrosion. The investigations of 75s alloy described herein reveal the most critical range of temperature and the effects of quenching sheet and extrusions at different rates through that temperature range, on the tensile properties and resistance to corrosion. Procedure Preparation of Specimens Sheet specimens (3 in. by 9 in.) were prepared from a commercial lot of 75s "as rolled" sheet (0.064 in. thick). The composition4 was as follows: Weight Percentage Cu Mn Mg Zn Cr A1 with Normal Impurities 1.64 0.16 2.58 5.66 0.27 Remainder The specimens employed for the determination of the time-temperature relations during quenching of sheet were prepared by the following procedure: the hot junction of a 28-ga. iron-constantan thermoelement (asbestos insulated) was brazed to a thin strip of aluminum which was in turn brazed into the end of a 3/16-in. id by %-in. od by 30 in. long aluminum protection tube. Before brazing, the tube was flattened to 0.064-in. thickness over the junction and adjacent lead wires for a distance of I 1/2 in. The flattened end of the tube was fitted into a slot cut from one edge to the center of the 3-in. by 9-in. by 0.064-in. sheet and brazed into place. The brazed joint was dressed to the thickness of the sheet and the entire specimen buffed to approximately the brightness of "as rolled" material. Because of the brazing operations required, these specimens were prepared using 3S alloy. For the investigation of quenching rates in heavy sections, there were used 75s extrusions which had compositions similar to that of the sheet. The specimens consisted of 14 in. lengths of 3i-in., 2-in., 3-in, and 4-in. diam cylindrical rods and a roughly rectangular extruded section which was approximately 4 in. by 7 1/2 in. Thcrmocouple~ were peened into the bottoms Of .1/8-in. diam wells drilled into one end and parallel to the axis to a depth of
Citation

APA: W. L. Fink L. A. Willey  (1949)  Technical Papers and Discussions - Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys - Quenching of 75S Aluminum Alloy (Metals Tech., Aug. 1947, TP 2225) With discussion

MLA: W. L. Fink L. A. Willey Technical Papers and Discussions - Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys - Quenching of 75S Aluminum Alloy (Metals Tech., Aug. 1947, TP 2225) With discussion. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1949.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account