Technical Papers - Geophysics - Significant Factors in Dust Control at Some Iron-ore Mines of the Lake Superior District (Mining Tech., Jan. 1947, TP 2087)

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Edward C. J. Urban
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
6
File Size:
280 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1949

Abstract

The nature of certain pernicious dusts commonly encountered in the removal of iron ore from the underground mines of the Lake Superior district is recognized, and appropriate measures for the protection of individuals subjected to these dusts have been applied in most mines for more than 10 years. Undoubtedly the principal concern has been demanded by dusts that contain as a constituent silicon dioxide in its free or uncombined state, the mineral we all know as quartz or chert. Investigators1 agree that among the factors that determine injurious exposure are: the composition of the dust, the concentration suspended at the breathing level and the duration of the exposure. We have on hand data that describe the experience of several underground iron-ore mines in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and Wisconsin in regard to these factors, which in a large measure also reflect the general experience of the other mines of the area. We believe that a discussion of these data will indicate the effectiveness of the dust-control methods that have been considered good practice and that have been employed over a long period of time. A silicosis-prevention program was ini- tiated by the iron mines of the Upper Peninsula in 1934 and records of mine dustiness are available from that date to the present time. For dust conditions previous to 1934 the results of observations conducted in other industries can be utilized together with local information pertaining to the development and initial application of rock-drilling equipment. Development of Rock DriI,I.s Thc earliest percussion rock drill that later had any industrial use was patented in this country in 1851.2 This machine was later modified and improved in many respects but its Piston-Type design remained standard for drilling equipment in most mines for the next 63 years.3 The piston drill was operated either by air or by steam. It employed a solid drill steel, fastened directly to the reciprocating piston. The drilling was done dry except in holes directed at an angle below the horizontal. For these water was manually injected into the hole and the pumping action of the rod expelled the sludge. The dry cuttings from drillings inclined above the horizontal fell from the hole by their own weight. A development of major importance from the standpoint of dust generation and control occurred with the invention by J. G. Leyner of a hammer-type rock drill that embodied the essential feature of a drill steel with a hollow core. His patent was secured in 1897. The machine was a radical departure in drilling method. The steel was held loosely in a chuck while
Citation

APA: Edward C. J. Urban  (1949)  Technical Papers - Geophysics - Significant Factors in Dust Control at Some Iron-ore Mines of the Lake Superior District (Mining Tech., Jan. 1947, TP 2087)

MLA: Edward C. J. Urban Technical Papers - Geophysics - Significant Factors in Dust Control at Some Iron-ore Mines of the Lake Superior District (Mining Tech., Jan. 1947, TP 2087). The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1949.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account