The Advantages of Standardizing Radiometric Exploration Measurements, and How To Do It

- Organization:
- Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
- Pages:
- 5
- File Size:
- 4105 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1977
Abstract
"IntroductionTHE PURPOSE of this paper is twofold. Firstly, to drawn attention to recommendations which have been accepted by the International Atomic Energy Agency concerning radiometric reporting methods and calibration in uranium exploration, and secondly to emphasize the benefits that- will stem from adopting them. These recommendations are contained in an IAEA Technical Report, No. 174, which has been prepared with the intention of serving as a general guide to the subject. The existence of this specialized report is likely to be unknown to most of those who can benefit unless it is given some publicity by an organization such as the CIM. The recommendations were prepared by a small international committee consisting of Dr, P. H. Dodd , U.S .A. , Dr. R. L. Grasty. Canada, Dr. L. Levborg, Denmark, Dr. M. Matolin, Czechoslovakia , Dr. S. D. Simov, Bulgaria, and the writer.The fact that there are standard scientific units of mass, distance and time is taken for granted, It is also accepted that the type of instrumentation used to measure one of these parameters is irrelevant to the way the measurement is reported. Geophysical parameters such as magnetic field strength and gravity have generally accepted units, the gamma and milligal, which are defined in SI terms. These units are employed irrespective of the operating principle, or manufacturer or organization involved in the measurement."
Citation
APA:
(1977) The Advantages of Standardizing Radiometric Exploration Measurements, and How To Do ItMLA: The Advantages of Standardizing Radiometric Exploration Measurements, and How To Do It. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 1977.