The Balance Between Practive and Theory in Mineral Processing Education

- Organization:
- The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 7
- File Size:
- 137 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1984
Abstract
The constraints in university courses are lack of hours, high cost of scientific equipment, and poor availability of suitably experienced staff. These have forced the balance away from practical work and towards more theory. Labelling of individuals as either practical, or academic, does not help the inter- change of staff between industry and univer- sities that is necessary to balance idealism and realism. Practical men who do return to universities may lose seniority and find that industry is reluctant to have them back. Academics who specialise too long may concentrate on their research to the exclusion of basic material. It is difficult to operate pilot scale plants in universities because of lack of time, and obsolescent equipment. Small grants from industry might enable tests to be run in research laboratories such as at C.S.I.R.O.. Within universities there may be a need for greater interchange of students among depart- ments, aided by the absence of weighted student unit measurements, as suggested by Aus.I.M.M. and A.M.I.C.
Citation
APA: (1984) The Balance Between Practive and Theory in Mineral Processing Education
MLA: The Balance Between Practive and Theory in Mineral Processing Education. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1984.