The Balance Between Practive and Theory in Mineral Processing Education
    
    - Organization:
 - The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
 - Pages:
 - 7
 - File Size:
 - 137 KB
 - Publication Date:
 - Jan 1, 1984
 
Abstract
The constraints in university courses are  lack of hours, high cost of scientific equipment,  and poor availability of suitably experienced  staff. These have forced the balance away from  practical work and towards more theory. Labelling of individuals as either  practical, or academic, does not help the inter- change of staff between industry and univer- sities that is necessary to balance idealism  and realism. Practical men who do return to  universities may lose seniority and find that  industry is reluctant to have them back.  Academics who specialise too long may concentrate  on their research to the exclusion of basic  material. It is difficult to operate pilot scale  plants in universities because of lack of time,  and obsolescent equipment. Small grants from  industry might enable tests to be run in  research laboratories such as at C.S.I.R.O..  Within universities there may be a need for  greater interchange of students among depart- ments, aided by the absence of weighted student  unit measurements, as suggested by Aus.I.M.M.  and A.M.I.C.
Citation
APA: (1984) The Balance Between Practive and Theory in Mineral Processing Education
MLA: The Balance Between Practive and Theory in Mineral Processing Education. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1984.