The Case For Periodic "Outsider" Operational Reviews

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 15
- File Size:
- 583 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1994
Abstract
Low metal prices and increasingly stringent environmental regulations, coupled with the threat of higher governmental royalties are adversely affecting both existing and new operations. Existing operations must therefore be run at maximum operating efficiencies to enable mining companies to survive and grow. Well planned and executed "outsider" reviews can help achieve this goal. Many mine managers and those who direct them resist the idea of "outsider" reviews for a variety of reasons, some valid and some not. Those managers who do bring in the "outsiders" are nearly unanimous in reporting that the exercise in self-discipline was well worth the pain and effort and repaid the cost many times over. This paper makes a strong case for "outsider" reviews and gives recommendations on the kinds of reviews to undertake. The authors draw upon their nearly 70 years combined experience, much of which has been in operations.
Citation
APA:
(1994) The Case For Periodic "Outsider" Operational ReviewsMLA: The Case For Periodic "Outsider" Operational Reviews. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1994.