The Future of Geological Education in the Pacific

- Organization:
- The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 2
- File Size:
- 48 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1990
Abstract
o Resource production is essential for society. o Demand for resources will increase as population grows.o Resource industries are the main consumer of trained geologists.o The lead time from(1) training to productivity(2) research to resource production is measured in years.o An adequate supply of well trained geologists and successful geological research is an important agent in ensuring cost effective, adequate supply of mineral resources for society. Therefore the main beneficiary of geological education is society itself.o Society is paradoxically apathetic or antagonistic to the resource industry because (1) it represents change(2) lobby groups working for other causes have successfully moulded a bogey man image for the resource industry in the public eye.Professional training and research for resource industries consequently lack popular support. Funding is at an absurdly low level in comparison with the economic importance of resource supply.
Citation
APA: (1990) The Future of Geological Education in the Pacific
MLA: The Future of Geological Education in the Pacific. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1990.