The Limit Of Fuel-Economy In The Iron Blast-Furnace.

Spokane Meeting, September, 1909.) THE following corrections to the paper of Mr. Langdon (Bulletin No. 34, October, 1909, pp. 919 to 940), received after the publication of the paper in the Bulletin, will be incorporated in the paper as finally published in the forthcoming Vol. XL. of the Transactions, but are here presented for the information of members:' Page. 921. Table I., furnace M2, item 11. For " 8801 " read "0.8801." 922. Table II., furnace C, item 2, under gas. For " 0.011 C " read " 0.011 0." Furnace G, item 13, under gas. For " 5.074 air " read " 3.074 air." Item 15, 114.269 " should be " 4.289." Furnace H, item 2, under iron. For " 0.04 " read ".0.01." 923. Table II., furnace J, item 1, under iron. For " 0.95 " read " 0.93." Furnace N2, item 6, under gas. For " 0.66 CO," read 0.066 C02." 924. Table III., furnace C, item 17. For " 379 " read " 397." 927. Table IV., furnace C, item 4. For " 0.0124 " read 0.0424." Furnace G, item 15.. For " 4,060 " read " 4,066." 928. Line 2. Items 19 and 20 of heat-supply, should be items 20 and 21. 930. Line 3. Expunge remainder of paragraph after the word " supplied," and substitute the following : "As compared with the fusion-zone, the loss by radiation n C was 25.5 per cent. of the total (2,278 units) supplied to that zone, while in D it was 22.5 per cent. of the total heat (1,824 units) supplied to that zone. Finally, as compared with the reduction-zone, C lost by radiation 36.8. per cent. of the 1,580 units supplied to that zone,