The Scientific Rationale For A Lower Radon Daughter Exposure

On April 21, 1980 the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Union (OCAW) submitted a petition urging the revision of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) permissible exposure limit to radon daughters in underground mines. This petition asks for: 1. Annual worker exposure to be lowered from the current 4 WLM/year to 0.7 WLM/year; 2. Full economic protection for workers whose exposure exceeds the proposed 0.7 WLM/ year; and 3. The primary means of lowering workers' radiation exposures shall be environmental controls. I will present the scientific rationale for the lower standard requested in our petition to the Department of Labor. [1. Radiation Exposures to Uranium Miners] Two types of radiation exposures are present in the environment of uranium mines: A. [External Exposure] to gamma sources which until 1978 was considered as negligible compared with internal alpha radiation. R. E. Utting (1), in an investigation of three Canadian uranium mines, found levels of exposures adding to an annual dose equivalent of 3 rems (30 mSv)/year. He concluded that gamma dosages may be a major fraction of the maximum permissible dose for many individual miners. The U.S. experience has shown that there is significant gamma exposure in U.S. uranium mines and, therefore, it could contribute to the total radiation exposure to the lungs in combination with internal alpha radiation. Before ventilation improvements in uranium mines, the contribution of external radiation to total lung dosage was relatively small. After improvements in ventilation, the reduction in internal radiation exposure appears to be in 1980 as low as 1/10 of the 1950 dosages. However, ventilation improvements do not affect external gamma radiation. Gamma radiation remains at the same 1950's level, and it represents today a higher proportion of the total radiation burden to the miner's lungs. MSHA regulations (57.5-47) state that if gamma exposure is below 2.0 milliroentgens per hour, then workers are not required to wear gamma dosimeters and cummulative gamma radiation records need not be kept. Assuming an exposure of 1.9 milliroentgens per hour per 173 hours/month for 12 months,a miner would accumulate a dose from external radiation of 3.9 rems/ year. This dosage would, of course, go unrecorded. MSHA, therefore, should consider a downward revision of the external radiation permissible exposure limit of 2.0 milliroentgens/hour. MSHA should make clear that this exposure level, when added to the internal exposure, does not make for sound health physics -even though the measured current levels do not approach 2.0 milliroentgens/hour. B. [Internal Exposure] to alpha radiation is still the larger contributor to lung irradiation in uranium miners. The target organ is still the lung. The parameters to be considered in determining the biological radiation load appear in Table I for radon daughters present in the upper respiratory tract (URT). TABLE I RADIATION DOSE PARAMETERS IN THE URT OF URANIUM MINERS Parameter Uranium Underground Mining [1. Quantity of the Absorbed Radon daughters (Po-218, Nuclide Pb-214, Bi-214) deposit in bronchial and lung tissue. (Measured by air concentration, Working Levels) 2. Type of Radiation Emitted Alpha Particles 3. Energy of Radiation High-Linear Energy Transfer 4. Half-life of the Nuclide Ra 222, 3.8 days in the Organ Po-218 (RaA), T1/2 = 3.1 minutes Pb-214 (RaB), T1/2 = 26.8 minutes Bi-264 (RaC), Vi = 19.7 minutes 5. Selection Factor of the Direct inhalation with mine Organ dust to be deposited in the tipper Respiratory Tract 6. Mass and Form of the Organ Especially cancer sensitive, tracheobronchial region and bronchi* 7. Distribution of the Activity Dependent on deposited dust in the Organ distribution in the Upper Respiratory Tract 8. Chemical Nature of All compounds (RaA, RaB, RaC) Incorporated Substance biologically insoluble. (Only localized, irradiation) *See Reference (2)] The parameters of Table I depend, in turn, on the demography of the exposed population, especially: 1. Age 2. Sex 3. Health Status 4. Genetic Constitution 5. Lifestyle (Smoking, Diet) Some of these demographic characteristics of uran-