Thickening - Art Or Science?

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
E. J. Roberts
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
4
File Size:
255 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1949

Abstract

Prior to 1916, thickening was an art, and any accurate decision as to what size of machine to install to handle a given tonnage of a specific ore must have been one of those intuitive conclusions, based on both intimate and extensive acquaintance with thickners and ore pulps. Then in 1916 "knowledge of acquaintance," became "knowledge about" with the publication of the Coe and Clevenger paper.' The unit operation of thickening had graduated to the status of an engineering science. The fundamental similitude relationships for the two major phases of the operation were defined so clearly that batch tests on models as small as liter cylinders could serve to specify protypes as large as 325 ft in diameter.
Citation

APA: E. J. Roberts  (1949)  Thickening - Art Or Science?

MLA: E. J. Roberts Thickening - Art Or Science?. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1949.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account