Underground or Open Pit?

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Robert C. Pruess C. H. Reynolds
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
2
File Size:
219 KB
Publication Date:
Jun 1, 1956

Abstract

Late in 1954 exploratory drilling indicated a substantial orebody on the Rattlesnake claims of Woodmont Inc., a Continental Uranium Inc. subsidiary. Woodmont holdings are located about 35 miles southeast of Moab, Utah. Only a few miles north of Big Indian Valley and other Chinle-sand uraninite deposits, the claims are in an entirely different geologic environment. Detailed development drilling continued until the Deep North orebody was outlined, covering an area approximately 300 x 450 ft. All exploratory drilling and about 80 pct of development drilling was wet core. Chemical assays for each hole sample, applied at 1-ft intervals against the measured core length, were put into a conventional ore calculation formula. Forty-six holes were drilled to delineate the Deep North orebody.
Citation

APA: Robert C. Pruess C. H. Reynolds  (1956)  Underground or Open Pit?

MLA: Robert C. Pruess C. H. Reynolds Underground or Open Pit?. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1956.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account