Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) : The Physics of Steel (see vol xxiii., p. 608)

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
39
File Size:
1654 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1895

Abstract

Albert SauveuR, South Chicago, Ill. (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Howe remarks (nuns., xxiii., 656) that, running through my paper, there is a tacit assumption that there is a constant and known relation between the coarseness of the grain of steel and its quality. The above assumption was not made tacitly. On the contrary, it is based upon the very experiments embodied in my paper. Indeed, most of those experiments were undertaken with that end in view, i.e., to ascertain the existence of such a relation. Mr. Howe calls attention to the fact that of two pieces of manganese-steel, originally from the same bar, the coarser-grained showed the greater strength and ductility. This refers to the fracture of the pieces; whereas, I have considered the micro-structure only, independent of the fracture; and I do not think that a coarse fracture
Citation

APA:  (1895)  Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) : The Physics of Steel (see vol xxiii., p. 608)

MLA: Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) : The Physics of Steel (see vol xxiii., p. 608). The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1895.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account