Washington D.C. Paper - Iron and Steel considered as Structural Materials – A Discussion, Papers and Remarks by (6d49267d-3cf3-4bb3-bf1e-31231817f036)

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
C. P. Sandberg
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
7
File Size:
378 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1882

Abstract

Having been occupied in inspecting and testing iron and steel these twenty years in England, and previous to that having served on the Board of Iron Masters in Sweden, I have naturally been very much interested in the subject of the use of steel for structures. I regret that I can offer but comparatively small experience on that had, having had principally to do with steel for railway plant and rails, but granting these to be a kind of "structure," and also that steel for rails has similar duties to perform in many respects, and is generally manufactured in the same way and at the same works as steel for stuctures, properly speaking, I may be entitled to offer an opinion on the use of steel in construction. In a paper recently presented to the Institution of Civil Engineers in London, Mr. Ewing Matheson has recommended that the Board of Trade rules should be amended so as to allow of a maximum straining of 8 tolls per square inch instead of 6 1/2 tons. But it is equally necessary to fix the amount of ductility or elongation of the metal for such a strain as 8 tons. Strength and ductility should always be spoken of together. Mr. Matheson says that steel can be manipulated in the factory in the same way and with the same tools as are used for iron. This can only be granted for mild steel; for hard steel would be spoilt by the rough mechanical treatment which iron can stand, such as punch ing, for instance; and the remedy for regaining the strength lost by punching hard steel, viz., annealing, cannot always be applied. Noth ing proves this fact better than the punching of steel rails of consid erable hardness, which caused fractures at an early period of steelunaking, and which resulted in the stipulation for drilling instead of punching the bolt-holes, which had been formerly applied to iron rails without any damage. In fact commissions to establish standard tests are now working on the Continent, principally in Germany, where
Citation

APA: C. P. Sandberg  (1882)  Washington D.C. Paper - Iron and Steel considered as Structural Materials – A Discussion, Papers and Remarks by (6d49267d-3cf3-4bb3-bf1e-31231817f036)

MLA: C. P. Sandberg Washington D.C. Paper - Iron and Steel considered as Structural Materials – A Discussion, Papers and Remarks by (6d49267d-3cf3-4bb3-bf1e-31231817f036). The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1882.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account