What the Building Shortage Means to the Mineral Industries

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Oliver Bowles Carl A. Gnam
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
2
File Size:
218 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1936

Abstract

THE construction industry normally contributes extensively to the general economic welfare of all sections of the country. Billions of dollars are spent for materials and labor, and the success or failure of many business enterprises depends upon the volume of construction. The steel, aluminum, copper, cement, brick and tile, lime, gypsum, stone, sand and gravel, and several of the less prominent mineral industries are vitally concerned. Of great interest, therefore, is the accumulation of needed construction following the relative inactivity of the past five years, the recent moderate revival in building, and the prospect of a broader and more definite upturn. One may judge the magnitude of possible expenditure for construction by what has occurred in the past. The peak years were 1925 to 1928, inclusive, when the annual values of con- tracts awarded amounted to over six billion dollars. In marked contrast was the 1933 total of about 1% billion, the lowest level shown in the Federal Reserve Board Index, which goes back to 1919, and the more favorable 1935 figure of about 1.7 billion. An increase of nearly four billion over the 1935 volume would be necessary to equal the peak year 1928.
Citation

APA: Oliver Bowles Carl A. Gnam  (1936)  What the Building Shortage Means to the Mineral Industries

MLA: Oliver Bowles Carl A. Gnam What the Building Shortage Means to the Mineral Industries. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1936.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account