Search Documents

Jan 1, 1944

Jan 1, 1948

Jan 1, 1931

Jan 1, 1934

Jan 1, 1931

Jan 1, 1958

Jan 1, 1940

[ ]

Jan 1, 1938

Jan 1, 1930

Between two and three years ago, in response to an unmistakable and insistent demand, the four Founder Societies appointed Committees on "Aims and Organization," or on "Development," charged with reporting on the internal organization and the external (non-professional) ac-tivities of the engineers societies and to advise as to coöperations and coordination. Each of these committees formulated a report, recognizing that effi-ciency in external activities could only be attained by intimate coopera-tion between the four Societies. As a consequence, each of the Founder Societies was requested to appoint members of a Joint Conference Committee, charged with discussing the situation and evolving if possible a plan of cooperation in external activities which would coordinate not only the efforts of the four Founder Societies but also other national technical and scientific societies, as well as local engineering and profes-sional associations, groups or clubs. The Joint Conference Committee entered on its task with enthusiasm, and after great labor evolved the outline and many of the details of plan for engineering cooperation in public and inter-society activities. This report has now been submitted to the Boards of the Four Founder Societies, and has been ordered printed by our Board for the information of our members.

Jan 12, 1919

The Development of Research and Quality Control in the Modern Steel Plant. By Leo F. Rein-artz. (Metals Technology, April 1943) Blast Furnace and Raw Materials Essential Considerations in the Design of Blast Furnaces. By A. L. Foell. (,Metals Technology, December 1942) Results Obtained from Surveys of Gas at Furnace Tops. By James M. Stapleton. (Metals Technology, January 1943) Physical Aspects of the Dust Catcher, Gas Washer and Precipitator on No. 3 Furnace at Carrie. By C. P. Clingerman and C. J. FleiscH. (Metals Technology, January 1943) Slag Control by Introduction of Flux through Blast-furnace Tuyeres. By Carl G. Hogberg (Metals Technology, January 1943) The Electrical Conductivity of Molten Blast-furnace Slags. By A. E. MaRtin and GerRard Derge. (Metals Technology, August 1943) Some Physical Characteristics of By-product Coke for Blast Furnaces. By CEarles C. Russell and MichaeL Perch. (Metals Technology, December 19+2) Pyrometry at the Coke Oven. By Robert B. Sosman. (Metals Technology, December 1942) Calcination Rates and Sizing of Blast-furnace Flux. By T. L. Joseph, H. M. Beatty and Gust Ritsianes. (Metals Technology, December 1942) The Low-temperature Gaseous Reduction of a Magnetite. By M. C. Udy and C. H. Lorig. (Metals Technology, October 1942) Steelmaking Problems of Total Operation in Steelmaking. By William C. Marshall and Frank G. Norris. (Metals Technology, April 1943) Silicon-oxygen Equilibria in Liquid Iron, By C. A. ZapFFe and C. E. Sims. (Metals Technology, September 1942) Equilibria of Liquid Iron and Simple Basic and Acid Slags in a Rolating Induction Furnace. By C. R. Taylor and John Chipman. (Metals Technology, September 1942) Rapid Analysis of Oxygen in Molten Iron and Steel. By Gerhard DeRGe. (Metals Technology, January 1943) Silver Chloride as a Medium for Study of Ingot Structures. By Karl L. Fetters and Margaret Dienes. (Metals Technology, August 1943)

Jan 1, 1943

The Development of Research and Quality Control in the Modern Steel Plant. By Leo F. Rein-artz. (Metals Technology, April 1943) Blast Furnace and Raw Materials Essential Considerations in the Design of Blast Furnaces. By A. L. Foell. (,Metals Technology, December 1942) Results Obtained from Surveys of Gas at Furnace Tops. By James M. Stapleton. (Metals Technology, January 1943) Physical Aspects of the Dust Catcher, Gas Washer and Precipitator on No. 3 Furnace at Carrie. By C. P. Clingerman and C. J. FleiscH. (Metals Technology, January 1943) Slag Control by Introduction of Flux through Blast-furnace Tuyeres. By Carl G. Hogberg (Metals Technology, January 1943) The Electrical Conductivity of Molten Blast-furnace Slags. By A. E. MaRtin and GerRard Derge. (Metals Technology, August 1943) Some Physical Characteristics of By-product Coke for Blast Furnaces. By CEarles C. Russell and MichaeL Perch. (Metals Technology, December 19+2) Pyrometry at the Coke Oven. By Robert B. Sosman. (Metals Technology, December 1942) Calcination Rates and Sizing of Blast-furnace Flux. By T. L. Joseph, H. M. Beatty and Gust Ritsianes. (Metals Technology, December 1942) The Low-temperature Gaseous Reduction of a Magnetite. By M. C. Udy and C. H. Lorig. (Metals Technology, October 1942) Steelmaking Problems of Total Operation in Steelmaking. By William C. Marshall and Frank G. Norris. (Metals Technology, April 1943) Silicon-oxygen Equilibria in Liquid Iron, By C. A. ZapFFe and C. E. Sims. (Metals Technology, September 1942) Equilibria of Liquid Iron and Simple Basic and Acid Slags in a Rolating Induction Furnace. By C. R. Taylor and John Chipman. (Metals Technology, September 1942) Rapid Analysis of Oxygen in Molten Iron and Steel. By Gerhard DeRGe. (Metals Technology, January 1943) Silver Chloride as a Medium for Study of Ingot Structures. By Karl L. Fetters and Margaret Dienes. (Metals Technology, August 1943)

Jan 1, 1943

By A. Tobey Yu

The recent adverse economic climate has added further impetus to the demand for better-grade and lower-cost raw materials, for which increasingly larger quantities of muck are being moved and processed at higher unit labor costs. As a result, the cost impact of handling and shipping has never been as keenly felt by the mining industry as it is today. Thanks to joint innovative efforts by users and manufacturers, new and improved automated bulk-handling systems and devices are now blossoming everywhere to give the mining man the tools he needs to move ore, waste and concentrates more efficiently and economically.

Jan 1, 1970

Geological and Natural History Survey of Wisconsin, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis - E. F Bean, State Geologist. A complete list of publications of this Survey will be sent upon request Only a portion of the Bulletins and Maps fall within the scope of this directory, and most of them are available They are: Bulletin 4, Building and ornamental stones of Wisconsin (1898), $2 50, 6, Preliminary report on the copper-bearing rocks of Douglas County, and parts of Washburn and Bayfield counties (1901), 50 cents, 7, The clays and clay industries of Wisconsin (pt 1) (1901), 50 cents; 14, Report on lead and zinc deposits of Wisconsin (the report is out of print but the 18 maps which accompanied it can still be had) (1906), 20 cents (a series of six maps, supplementary to these (1909), may be had for 6 cents), 15, The clays of Wisconsin and their uses (1906), 50 cents; 16, The geology of north-central Wisconsin (1907), $2, 17, The abandoned shore lines of eastern Wisconsin (1907), 50 cents, 19, Zinc and lead deposits of the Upper Mississippi Valley (1907), 25 cents; 34, The limestone road materials of Wisconsin (1914), 50 cents, 35, Underground and surface water supplies of Wisconsin (1915), $150, 36, The physiography of Wisconsin (new edition now in press) (1916), $125, 41, A study of methods of mine assessments and valuation (1914), 50 cents; 44, Mineral land classification in parts of northwestern Wisconsin (1915), $5, 45, The peat resources of Wisconsin (1915), 50 cents, 46, Mineral

Jan 1, 1933

By J. B. Macelwane

GEOPHYSICS differs from geology and physics in many respects. In the first place, geophysics is a complex science embracing the fields of seismology, geomagnetism, geoelectricity, geodesy, meteorology, volcanology, physical oceanography, physical hydrology, tectonophysics and exploration geophysics. Geology is also a complex science and so extensive in its various fields that no one can master them all, and no part of geology deals in any sense with several of these fields of geophysics. In the second place, geophysics makes use of methods and instruments that are derived primarily from the science of physics. Geology, on the other hand, has methods of its own and it draws its borrowed techniques and its instrumental equipment not only from physics but also and perhaps primarily from chemistry and biology. The difference, therefore, between the geophysicist and the geologist lies partly in the phenomena that are observed, partly in the methods and instruments with which each carries on his exploration; but partly also, and perhaps principally, in the habitual attitude of mind and in the background of specialized training with which each approaches the problems presented by this planet of ours. The geologist as such, therefore, is no geophysicist. On the other hand, the physicist is not a geophysicist either. Isolation of each problem in a closed laboratory system under complete control is fundamental to the methods of the physicist. The geophysicist must apply physical instruments and physicomathematical reasoning to the study of physical quantities in their undisturbed natural environment. What, then, is a geophysicist? In the sense that he is a trained expert in all of the geophysical sciences, I do not believe that such a person ever existed. It would be beyond the possibilities of a single lifetime. I think there is confusion in our ideas and in our use of terms. We are not all thinking of the same thing when we say geophysics or geophysicist; yet we seem to talk as though we were. It is as absurd to say that the whole of geophysics belongs to geology because the field of a particular type of geophysicist-the exploration geophysicist -calls for some knowledge of geology as it would be to say that the whole of biology belongs to geology because a particular type of biologist-the paleontologistneeds some knowledge of geology. DEVELOPMENT OF A GEOPHYSICIST Since it is impossible to become an expert in all the fields of geophysics, and since students entering college seldom know the field they will choose as a career, what would we suggest as the best general preparation for work in geophysics, whether as a meteorologist, an oceanographer, a seismologist, a geodesist, a geomagneticist, a volcanologist, a tectonophysicist, a hydrologist, or an exploration geophysicist? We may distinguish five phases in the development of a geophysicist: (I) his mathematical and scientific studies in high school; (2) the general mathematical and scientific

Jan 1, 1941

5. The medal committee may invite nominations from the membership of the Institute, such nominations to be accompanied by an argument in favor of the award and details sufficient for a proper citation to be drawn. This medal has been awarded as follows: 1927—David William Brunton. 1929—John Hays Hammond. 1928—Herbert Hoover. 1930-Daniel C. Jackling. Miscellaneous Prizes Many of the Local Sections have established or administer prizes for the best paper presented within the year by any junior member. Annual Lectures Howe Memorial Lecture The Howe Memorial Lecture, in memory of Henry Marion Howe, Past President of the Institute, was authorized in April, 1923, as an annual address to be delivered by invitation under the auspices of the Institute by an individual of recognized and outstanding attainment in the science and practice of iron and steel metallurgy or metallography, chosen by the Board of Directors upon recommendation of the Iron and Steel Division. The following were the Howe lectures and lecturers for the years indicated: 1924 What is Steel? By Albert Sauveur. 1925 Austenite and Austenitic Steels. By John A. Mathews. 1926 Twenty-Eve Years of Metallography. By William Campbell. 1927 Alloy Steels. By Bradley Stoughton. 1928 Significance of the Simple Steel Analysis. By Harry D. Hibbard. 1929 Studies of Hadfield's Manganese Steel with the High-power Microscope. By John Howe Hall. 1930 The Future of the American Iron and Steel Industry. By Zay Jeffries. Institute of Metals Lecture An annual lectureship was established in 1921 by the Institute of Metals and it has come to be one of the important functions of the Annual Meeting. A number of distinguished men from this country and abroad have served in this lectureship. The roll is quoted below: 1922 Colloid Chemistry and Metallurgy. By Wider D. Bancroft. 1923 Solid Solution. By Walter Rosenhain. 1924 The Trend in the Science of Metals. By Zay Jeffries. 1925 Action of Hot Wall: a Factor of Fundamental Influence on the Rapid Corrosion of Water Tubes and Related to the Segregation in Hot Metals. By Carl Benedicks. 1926 The Relation between Metallurgy and Atomic Structure. By Paul D. Foote. 1927 Growth of Metallic Crystals. By Cecil H. Desch. 1928 Twining in Metals. By C. H. Mathewson. 1929 The Passivity of Metals, and Its Relation to Problems of Corrosion. By Ulick R. Evans. 1930 Hard Metal Carbides and Cemented Tungsten Carbide. By 8. L. Hopt.

Jan 1, 1930

By J. S. Wakeman

INTRODUCTION The primary purpose of comminution circuits in the mineral industry is to reduce an ore to a particle size that will permit separation of the valuable minerals from its gangue constituents. Wide variations in the mineral content and physical characteristics can and do occur throughout a given mineral deposit From the standpoint of their effects on the comminution characteristics of an orebody, these variations may not be identified by the normal sampling and analysis procedures utilized to delimit an orebody and to characterize its grade distribution. The proper design of a comminution circuit for a mineral deposit is very important to the success of that enterprise. It is also an expensive unit process both from the standpoint of capital and operating costs. It is, therefore, essential that any sampling program be designed to identify the variations that may occur that will affect this circuit. Because of the variety of comminution systems that are available, it is also essential that the sampling and subsequent evaluation program be sufficiently comprehensive to identify potentially inappropriate systems or flowsheets. It would be impossible to describe in a single chapter the techniques and approaches that should be utilized for sampling every type of orebody. Each orebody is unique and requires a sampling and testing program designed to its specific requirements for exploration, characterization and circuit design. The following is a general discussion of the guidelines to be used and considerations to be made in establishing such a program. SAMPLE SELECTION When sampling an ore deposit for the purposes of equipment and flowsheet selection for comminution, it is important that the sample composites for grind testing be chosen on the basis of how they will affect the comminution circuit rather than just how they might affect the subsequent metallurgical operations. For example, grindability, classification and liberation size characteristics are more important to the comminution circuit than ore grade. Mineral deposits may contain a multiplicity of ore types that can vary extensively in the dissemination of minerals and optimum liberation size requirements; and may also vary as much as 100% in ore hardness. The accumulation of samples for grind characterization should be done in such a way as to allow the identification of this variation. A proper mineralogical evaluation of the samples obtained to characterize an ore deposit can be a great aid in identifying the individual ore types within the deposit

Jan 1, 1982

By Horace Williams

IN VIEW of the frequent occurrence of petroleum in other parts of the world, it seems odd that so large an area as is contained within the borders of Brazil should be without this product. This apparent deficiency may be due, however, to our ignorance of the regions in which-it, may exist. In some places, indications point to the probable existence of petroleum in ages gone by; and while the presence of petroleum pools may be problematic, in several regions conditions not unfavorable to their occurrence exist. Yet, Brazil has enormous oil resources in the rich oil-shales in different parts of the country. Many of these shales are very rich and only suitable processes for the extraction of the oil are lacking. At the present time, only a few small experimental plants are producing oil by distillation from these shales. These plants have been the subject of recent investigations by the Geological and Mineralogical Survey, a. pre-liminary report of which is in the hands of the printer. The only regions where studies have not been made are the upper Amazon, the Acre, the Rio Negro, and the Peruvian frontier, which really seems to be the most promising field for, explorations of any in the country. In the vast plateau region of the interior north of the 20th parallel of latitude, granites, gneiss, mica schists, and, very old metamorphosed sedimentaries predominate. Later, sedimentaries occupy a minor position and, where found in the interior, represent a thin veneering resting on the older rocks. At several places near the coast they have a greater development and contain considerable beds of oil-shale and may, in some cases, offer conditions favorable for the occurrence of oil. Such deposits are found in the Permian rocks of central-and southern Maranhão; in the Tertiary and Cretaceous beds along the coast of Alagôas Sergipe, Bahia, and perhaps farther south in Espirito Santo; and in the Parahyba embayment north of Cape Frio and in the interior Tertiary basin of eastern Sao Paulo.

Jan 9, 1920

By Edward H. Robie

OF the current Adirondack iron mine development, the Benson Mines operation of the Tones and Laughlin Ore Co. (Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. wholly owned subsidiary) is the last to go into operation. Following an active construction program in 1943, the mine. concentrator and sintering plant were scheduled to enter production in the fall. This description therefore cannot include any operating data, and details of equipment and flowsheet have not as yet been released.

Jan 1, 1943

By Thomas L. Watson

My thanks are due to Mr. Frank Firmstone, Easton, Pa., who has called my attention to the statement in my paper' that " Barite, fluorite and quartz, thougll not observed in the Tennessee area," ... as possibly misleading to the reader, if construed to mean that such a discovery had never been made. Mr. Firmstone is correct in assuming that this statement referred only to the study of the worked areas of the metallic ores, especially zinc, made in the course of the survey upon which my paper was based. The occurrence of barite and fluorite with lead-ores in Tennessee was reported by Prof. Safford? in 1869, and by Safford and Killebrew? in 1887, with the further statement that about 1,000,000 lb. of barite were annually mined in Greene, Washington and Jefferson counties, Tenn., and that considerable deposits occur also in McMinn, Smith and other counties. It is also noted that the barite " usually occurs in veins, associated with galena." The present worked areas of barite are, however, distinct barite propositions, without workable quantities of either lead or zinc, so far as mining operations have gone, and the areas are more or less removed from the present areas of zinc-ores. Mr. Firmstone informs me also that, in 1892, he observed, in the magnesian limestone at Watauga Point, in Carter county, on the left bank of the Watauga river, a little below the mouth of Buffalo creek, small quantities of galena and some fluorite.

Jan 1, 1907