Search Documents

By Herschel Sanson

Success of underground blasting operations depends upon a number of interrelated factors. These include conditions at the place, blasting methods, face preparation, type of cap, powder selection, transportation and storage. In addition, much of the work is closely regulated by state and federal regulations.

Jan 1, 1975

By Thomas L. Linton

The results of an extensive literature review and field experiments regarding the effects detonation of high energy explosive have upon various aquatic organisms are reported. These results were used to modify regulatory permitting criteria in Texas. Three separate field experiments were conducted. In the first study, surface placed charges were used in a marine habitat. In the other two, the charges were placed in drilled holes. In one, which was in a freshwater environment, the drilled holes were filled with drilling mud after placement of the charges. In the second, which was in an estuarine environment the holes were allowed to sit for thirty days prior to detonation to permit natural back-filling to occur by water transported sediments. A variety of aquatic organisms held in wire cages were exposed to detonations. Immediate and long-term effects of the exposure were determined based on external and internal visual observations. Damage to aquatic organisms was found to be reduced by placing the explosives in drilled holes and back-filling the holes prior to detonation of the explosives.

Jan 1, 1997

I am interested in experiences people have had with blasting near existing railroad tracks: What kind of vibration criteria are used, and how successful you have been in gaining approval for blasting in the vicinity of railroads. This would both be for passenger and freight railroads

Jan 1, 2008

By Liu Hui Yang Nianhua Feng Shuyu

The paper analyzed the dynamic stress in the rock around the tunnel and the effect on the stress variation for the different blasting parameters. Also, the paper verified the theoretical results by dynamic photoelastical tests and provided helpful reference for the design of blasting near a tunnel.

Jan 1, 1998

By James Camp

"During the 1950's a cement plant was rebuilt along a Missouri River bluff. The escarpmentwas composed of inter_bedded shale and limestone, typical to western Missouri. All of theraw materials needed to produce cement had been mined via room and pillar at the plantsite since the late 1800's. Portions of the mine began to fail in the late 60's., and by the mid70's M.S.H.A. declared all the areas where the lower Winterset limestone had beenremoved from the back to be ""unsafe"". M.S.H.A. explained that no work could beperformed in or above these unsafe areas unless the work itself was to render the area safe."

Jan 1, 1993

By Jaime Huidobro, Mervin Austin

The effect on an explosive column of the sharp transient stress waves generated during the earlier detonation of adjacent blastholes is of paramount importance to explosives users. Some explosives will sympathetically detonate under these stresses. Others may suffer a transient desensitization, arising from a temporary increase in the density of an explosive beyond certain limits and persisting until the explosive mass relaxes back to the original density. Some explosives are so adversely affected by these stresses that the product suffers immediate and permanent loss of sensitivity. These effects can be clearly seen while blasting in tough conditions such as burn cuts or wedge cuts and in materials, such as coals, that propagate shock waves well.

Jan 1, 1992

By Robert M. Carland, Horace Gene Biggs, David Holland

At a North Carolina feldspar surface mine, the orebody contains intrusions of waste material occurring at various angles from horizontal to dipping, and varying considerably in thickness. In order to obtain optimum feed for the mill, it is desirable to obtain maximum separation of ore from waste during blasting and digging.

Jan 1, 1990

By He Guangyi, Han Zhilong

This paper introduces the new technology of deep-hole blasting with water-soil mixed stemming to exposed stonework. Nine aspects of advantages are drawn in the paper based on tests of different types of charge and stemming under the conditions of different geology, height of bench and diameter of drill.

Jan 1, 1998

By Sehoon Lee, Duhwoe Jung, Eunsu Cha, Kyeonghwan Jeong

This case study presents the effectiveness of underground rock blasting to facilitate the trench cut in the hard rock layer using a conventional trench cutter for the construction of a diaphragm wall. Rock blastings are pre-performed up to the scheduled depth and then the fragmented rocks can be easily cut using a conventional trench cutter. Two trial underground rock blastings have been performed and the effectiveness of pre-blasting is presented in terms of a cutting rate, a loss of cutter heads and an amount of overbreak. Based on the results obtained from the trial underground rock blastings, the following conclusions can be appropriate: 1) A pre-blasting of hard rock layer located in depth can help to overcome the limitation of the trench cut using a conventional trench cutter. If the hard rock layer is fragmented after blasting, the fragmented rocks can be easily cut using a conventional trench cutter, 2) The speed of cutting works was accelerated and the loss of cutter heads was significantly reduced in the sections where the blastings were applied prior to cutting. 3) The amount of overbreak, expressed in terms of the amount of poured concrete, can be reduced to some extent. However, the location of blast holes in the trench can also contribute to the amount of overbreak. The closer the location of blast holes to the edge of the trench, the more extensive fractured and cracked zone can be formed on the face of the trench. This can increase the amount of overbreak if the trench is left empty for a while.

Jan 1, 2000

By Lewis L. Oriard

Ground vibrations associated with blasting are generally in a higher frequency range and of shorter duration than those generated by earthquakes, and the intensity scales for earthquakes cannot be applied directly to blasting vibrations without modification. Further, the profession does not need an intensity scale merely to estimate vibration intensity. If the blasting in question was not monitored instrumentally, it is a simple matter to estimate the range of intensities based on published prediction formulae or data from various sources such as Oriard (1), Nicholls et al (2), Hendron and Oriard (3), Siskind et al (4), and others. However, the profession has a serious need, for purposes of evaluating damage claims, to understand the relationships between vibration intensities and the levels of observed effects. The criteria for threshold damage do not apply to typical cases which usually involve structural damage. If the damage in question would have required ground vibration with a particle velocity of, say, 20-120 ips, damage is not verified by showing that the vibration merely approached a suggested limit to avoid threshold damage. That is not the question. This paper provides some guidelines for comparing severity of damage to intensity of vibration which would be required to cause such damage, much as is done when determining earthquake intensities. In addition, this paper includes a discussion of strain amplitudes induced by environmental forces, the predominant causes of damage to structures. Also, certain popular myths regarding blasting damage are discussed in the paper. Due to space limitations, the paper will not include a discussion of airblast effects.

Jan 1, 1989

By Michael David Wilkins, Paul N. Worsey

Little research has been published on stemming blast holes, particularly what happens during the process. Previous work has concentrated on the performance of the inert material to find the best way to seal the hole and retain the explosive energy, at the exclusion of determining what happens during the loading and stemming process.

Jan 1, 1998

By Gregory Lorsbach, Wade Hutchison, Earnest Grigoryan

Comparing measurements from multiple seismographs, particularly when the instruments are deployed in a “side-by-side” situation, is often problematic. Measurements often differ by as much as a factor of two. These differences are attributed to issues related to calibration, geophone coupling, and differences in geology over very short distances. Unfortunately, these explanations are often purely qualitative, but are accepted as factual. Shake table testing often demonstrates that those seismographs that indicate large differences for a particular vibration event, may correlate within a few percent of each other and the known shake table input. Geophone coupling also does not fully explain the difference in measurements since geophones in side-by-side measurements are deployed identically. Differences in geology do not explain the difference in measurements since it would be unrealistic to expect significant differences in distances less than one meter in a normal monitoring situation. Utilizing a new technological approach to vibration measurement and analyzing numerous side-by-side measurements, it has become clear that a significant portion of the observed differences between seismograph measurements are instrumentation induced. This study examines and describes some of the most significant sources of the seismograph error budget.

Jan 1, 2005

By Jason Baird, Seokbin Lim

Run up is a factor in Linear Shaped Charge (LSC) cutting for which an account must be made. It occurs on the initiation segment of the charge, and the cutting performance during this period is significantly lower. Previous investigations by the UMR Explosives Group observed that similar effects occur not only with LSCs but a wide range of other explosives applications, including explosive-driven flux-compression generators. Prior to this investigation, it was believed that the main contributing factors to run up were from the combined effects of explosive run up (detonation pressure), lack of confinement at the free, initiation end of the charge, and penetrator transition from segmented pieces to a long-rod penetrator blade. As an initial step to understanding the mechanics of LSC run up, a series of investigations was performed in which the testing series was divided into several sub-categories (explosive detonation pressure run up, lack of confinement and long-rod penetrator concept) in order to reveal the effect of each on the run up. Predominantly, commercially manufactured LSCs were used for the investigation, and the entire testing was completed by the UMR Explosives Group.

Jan 1, 2006

By Paul Ross, Harry Burchett, Lou Case, Calvin J. Konya

"The Cumberland River in Harlan, Kentucky has flooded the town for numerous years. TheU.S. Army Corps of Engineers funded a project to divert the river. The project consisted oftunneling through a mountain to divert the river. The approaches to the tunnels requiredcontrolled blasting to create noses to help channel the water and debris into the tunnels.The geologic structure was such that conventional presplitting techniques were notproducing the desired results and were causing severe backbreak. Replacement of the rocknoses with concrete would cost about a million dollars; and therefore it was important tosave them if at all possible. Blasting techniques were developed which allowed the projectto be successfully completed. This paper will discuss the case history of the controlledblasting procedures."

Jan 1, 1993

By Omer Yilmaz Erkoc, Gulsec Uyar Aldas

Blasting techniques, which have been used for a long time in Turkey, are powerful and economical tool in producing raw material in mining, quarrying, construction .etc. industries. The development of the society within the world has resulted in a substantial increase in the scale of such industrial projects. However, the expansion of such activity has been matched by an increased public awareness of environmental issues, particularly when it occurs in relatively close proximity to residential areas. One of the most troublesome issues facing the mining, quarrying and construction industries when carrying out their blasting activities is that of ground vibration. Because, blasting induced ground vibration can reach to very far distances from the source and has the potential for damage to concern to the inhabitants of property.

Jan 1, 2002

Tracer blasting is commonly used in Canadian underground mines for overbreak control. It involves tracing a column of ANFO with a low strength detonating cord. In order to investigate the effectiveness of tracer blasting in perimeter control and to understand its mechanism, a field experimentation was conducted which involved drifting, benching and pipe tests.

Jan 1, 1994

By R J. Roach, D Roy

After months of discussion on ways and means to improve productivity in the shaft sinking process, it was decided to look at those areas where, historically, methods have been stagnant for many years. These categories included drilling, hole diameter, drill patterns, explosive types, explosive loads, initiation techniques, cut design, wall control, fragmentation and heated magazines.

Jan 1, 1997

By T Michael LeBlanc

Drill trajectory deviation is a recurring problem in vertical retreat stoping operations. As a result of this deviation, 60 kilogram (165 millimetre diameter) and 103 kilogram (302 millimetre diameter) explosive charges are routinely detonated beyond ore/waste contact zones. Consequently, there follows a reduction in finished stope wall stability and an increase in ore dilution.

Jan 1, 1996

By Larry Mirabelli, Gerard J. O'Brien

"The construction of the Third Harbor Tunnel is a key element of the Central Artery TunnelProject. The tunnel is to traverse Boston Harbor directly linking South Boston to EastBoston. The tunnel is a cut and cover tunnel as opposed to a bored tunnel. The cutdimensions are 95' wide, 110' deep and approximately 4000' in overall length."

Jan 1, 1993

By P N. Blakey

The base metal orebody of Texasgulf Canada Ltd. was mined initially by open pit. Conventional mining techniques were followed underground, but experimentation showed that open pit methods of drilling and blasting could be adapted. This paper deals with the consequent development of blasting techniques to suit underground stope design and damage criteria, in a large tonnage operation.

Jan 1, 1978