Search Documents

By Basil B. Zavoico

Production of crude oil in the U.S.S.R. during 1940 is estimated at 222,600,000 bbl., as compared with the revised figure for the preceding year of 220,866,000 bbl., an increase of 0.79 per cent, and at least 20 per cent under the planned output. Baku district (Transcaucasus) remained the outstanding producing area, accounting for 72.33 per cent of the country's production, and this relative importance of the Apsheron Peninsula oil fields will probably continue lor many years to come. In the North Caucasus the Grozny-Dagestan area further extended its decline and the current production in this district amounts to only 6.06 Per cent Of the total U.S.S.R. output, as compared with 35.76 Per cent in 1931 The production of the Kuban-Maikop district remained virtually ullchanged from the preceding year, amounting to 7.64 per cent of the country's total. The Caucasian Province, therefore, in I940 produced 86.03 Per cent of the total production of the U.S.S.R. The promising new Permian Basin district, called Ural-Volga, and referred to sometimes as the "Second Baku," increased its production appreciably during 1940 and the output of that area amounted to 8.31 per cent of the country's total, as compared with 6.35 per cent during 1939. Production in the secondary districts of Russia continued unchanged though some new discoveries in the Emba salt-dome basin suggest that the output of that district may show some increase during the coming years. The drilling operations in Russia during 1940 reached a stage of virtual breakdown and the original footage plans were fulfilled only to the extent of around 50 per cent, while exploration drilling schedules were fulfilled only to the extent of about 25 to 35 per cent. This condition was due to the obvious lack of modern drilling rigs, of good drill pipe and of strong casing. Extended breakdowns occurred with deeper drilling, particularly because with few good drilling rigs available speed was being attempted with rotation rates that the inferior drill pipe and bits could not stand. Twistoffs and endless fishing jobs resulted. The difficulties became so serious a handicap to the Soviet oil industry that it was found imperative to order American drilling equipment and pipe in quantity, a policy that was never favored in the U.S.S.R because it requires expenditure of gold or exchange in major volume, and such exchange usually is reserved only to less bulky key items or to orders directly connected with armaments; also, oil-field machinery is very bulky and the prevailing lack of bottoms makes the transport of the indicated equipment a major problem. But little progress was similarly made in other branches of the Soviet oil industry. NO new major pipe-line construction work was undertaken, consequently the railroads continued to be overburdened with traffic that could be much more effectively handled by pipe lines. No new refinery construction of any magnitude was initiated, though several plants that had been in course of construction for several years were completed during 1940 and operation 554

Jan 1, 1941

By H. M. Morse

This report on oil and gas development in Mississippi covers the period from Jan. I, 1944, to Dec. 31, 1944: Salt Domes During the year six salt domes were drilled for sulphur, but no commercial sulphur deposits were found. One salt dome, the Bruinsburg, in Claiborne County, has produced gas- at 935 to 940 ft' in Moody's Branch marl. The Stringer salt dome in Smith County and the Ruth salt dome in Lincoln County both had a slight showing of heavy oil. Other salt domes have been dry. In addition to the Bruinsburg dome, the Allen salt dome, in Copiah County, and the Richton salt dome, in Perry County, were discovered in 1944; also the Sumrall dome, in Covington County. New Oil Fields Baxtemille Oil Field.—The Baxterville oil field was discoveredby the Gulf Refining Co, in sec. 7, T. I N., R. 16 W., Lamar County. At the end of the year this field had one oil well, with two active operations. Production for 1944 was 1047 bbl. of oil. GwinvilLe Field.—Gwinville field was discovered by S. W. Richardson, in sec. 24, T. 9 N., R. 19 W., Jefferson Davis County. This discovery well was a gas-distillate well, the oil being crystal clear. At the end of 1944 there were two gas wells and one oil well in the field. The oil well is approximately 2 1/2-miles from the gas- distillate wells. Gas production was 55,801 M cu. ft. and the distillate production was 2644 barrels. Heidelberg Oil Field.— The Gulf Refining Co. discovered the Heidelberg field in sec. 30, T. I N., R. 13 E., Jasper County, in January 1944. This field has by far exceeded the other 1943 and 1944 discoveries, having approximately 56 oil wells, 7 dry holes, and 10 active wells at the end of the year. Production to Jan. I, 1945 was 1,441,192 bbl. of oil. Mallalieu Oil Field.—The california Company discovered the Mallalieu oil field in set. 10, T. 7 N., R. 8 E,, Licoln. County. At the end of the year there was one well in the field with three active operations. Production was 32,303 bbl. of oil. Old Oil Fields Brookhaven Oil Field, in Lincoln County, has one oil well, which produced 2590 bbl. of oil during 1944. CarY Oil Field, Sharkey County1 has only one producing well, which produced 11,818 bbl- of oil during the Year- In Cranfield Oil Field, dams County, II oil wells and two gas-distillate wells were drilled in 1944 and there were five active wells on Dee. 31, 1944- The total production for the Year was 5251422 bbl-of oil. The gravity of the oil is 40" to 54.9'- In Eucutta Oil Field1 Wayne County1 34 oil wells were completed during 1944. There were five dry holes and six active wells at the end of the year.. The field produced 454,332 bbl. of all d the average gravity is 25" Flora Oil Field, Madison County, pro-

Jan 1, 1945

By C. E. Birchenall, W. Batz, H. W. Mean

AT temperatures between 1095' and 1347ºC, 13 runs have been made on the diffusion of silicon in iron. In two of the runs the couple compositions were entirely within the loop of the Fe-Si system; the base alloys contained 0.0 and 1.0 wt pct Si. The other runs in which the couples consisted of a 2.3 wt pct Si alloy welded to a 3.7 pct Si alloy were a phase throughout. The alloys were made by melting electrolytic iron and commercially pure silicon. Trace impurities were not determined. The butt welded couples were diffused in an inert atmosphere of argon or hydrogen. After cooling, cuts of two mils or greater thickness were machined parallel to the weld interface. The chips were analyzed for silicon. When the concentration and distance data were examined on the conventional probability plot,' no marked variation of the diffusion coefficient with concentration was indicated over the narrow composition ranges employed. Therefore, a single diffusion coefficient is recorded for each run in Table I. The temperatures and atmospheres of the diffusion anneal are listed along with the compositions of the base alloys. For a iron the silicon diffusion coefficient is given by the equation: D = 0.44 e-48,000/RT where R is the gas Constant and T, the absolute temperature. However, since the scatter in the data is fairly large, the activation energy may be in error by as much as 6000 cal per g-atom. The two ? iron points do not permit estimation of the activation energy with any reasonable certainty. They do indicate that the coefficients reported by Smithells2 and Jost,3 based on the work of Fry,4 are much too high. Although very dilute solutions in iron of manganese,5 nickel,8 cobalt,7 and molybdenum8 give dif- fusion coefficients quite close to those obtained for self-diffusion in iron, the silicon values are considerably higher, though of the same order of magnitude. This seems to be consistent with the fact that the silicon atom is the only one of those listed here which is appreciably smaller than iron. The authors are grateful to the Office of Naval Research for their support of this work under Contract N6ori-47, Task order IV, Project NR 031-184, to J. K. Stanley and the Westinghouse Research Laboratories for the silicon alloys used, to several steel companies for the silicon analyses, and to C. Wells, of the Metals Research Laboratory, Carnegie Institute of Technology, for numerous suggestions during the course of the work. References 'C. Wells: Atom Movements (1951) Chapter 2. A.S.M. 2C. J. Smithells: Metals Reference Book (1949) p. 405. Interscience. Pub. Co. 3W. Jost: Diffusion (1952) p. 223. Academic Press. 4 A. Fry: Stahl und Eisen (1923) 43, p. 1039. T. Wells and R. F. Mehl: Trans. AIME (1941) 145, p. 315. "C. Wells and R. F. Mehl: Trans. AIME (1941) 145, p. 329. 7M. F. Hawkes and R. F. Mehl: Trans. AIME (1947) 172, p. 467; Metals Technology (August 1947). .J. L. Ham: Trans. A.S.M. (1945) 35, p. 331.

Jan 1, 1953

The following is an incomplete list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period June 10, 1918 to July 10, 1918. F. C. Alsdorf, Tucson, Ariz. Emory M. Marshall, Camp Raritan, N. J. Juan F. Brandes, Santa Barbara, Cal. Jacques S. Negru, Camp Niagara, Ont. .H. Smith Clark, Kansas City, Mo. Arvid E. Nissen, High Bridge, N. J. J. S. Cunningham, Charleston, W. Va. Richard G. Place, So. Strafford, Vt. W. G. Eberhardt, Tucson, Ariz. Frank H. Probert, Berkeley, Cal. M. Eldredge, Bombay,. India. Martin A. Roudabush, Osterburg, Pa. A. D. R. Galloway, Accra, W. Africa;. P. H. Royster, Minneapolis, Minn. F. Hanst, Harrisburg, Pa. J. L. Schueler, Peoria, Ill. B. B. Hood, Chrome, N.. J. Henry B. Smith, New Britain, Conn. Paul S. King, Wilmington, Del. W. G. Sommer, Peoria, Ill. E. D. Kinney, Anaconda, Mont. A. L. Toenges, Roanoke, Va. E. W. Kohl, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. G. D. B. Turner, Butte, Mont. James W. Love, Knoxville, Tenn. A. T. Ward, Bellefonte, Pa. Edwin A. Austin, formerly with the Yukon Gold Co., is superintendent of the Elkoro mine at Jarbidge, Nev. John W. Beard is now with the Cia Minera de Penoles, Ojuela, Dgo., Mexico, via Mapimi. R. S. Bonsib has accepted a position with the United States Emergency Fleet Corporation as District Safety Engineer, San Francisco, Cal. Albert Burch has been appointed by the Bureau of Mines to encourage the mining of chrome. F. B. Caldwell is working for the U. S. Bureau of Mines, under Albert Burch, in the investigation of chromite deposits. W. A. Carlyle has taken over the duties (in addition to his own) formerly assigned to E. P. Mathewson with the British America Nickel Corporation, at Sudbury, Canada. R. M. Catlin received the honorary degree of Doctor of Science at the recent commencement of Rutgers College, New Brunswick, N. J. S. K. Dahl is giving up his position as mill superintendent with the Messina Mines, which have been suspended, and is returning to this country. Algernon Del Mar has become manager of the Techatticup mines, El Dorado Canyon, Nev. Robert Dye has succeeded D. L. Forbes as manager of the Teck-Hughes at Kirkland Lake, Ont., Canada. J. O. Elton, superintendent of the Anaconda company's electrolytic zinc plant at Great Falls, Mont., is doing special work with the U. S. Bureau of Mines. R. B. Caples takes charge of the plant in his absence. George H. Gibbs has resigned his position as engineer at Messrs. T. & 1. Bradley & Sons, Ltd., Darlaston blast furnaces, Darlaston, and is now located at "Belmont." Litchfield Road, Rushall, Walsall, England. William D. Gordon, for the past 7 years manager of The Mine & Smelter Supply Co. at El Paso, has been elected president of Camphuis, Rives & Gordon,. Inc., and has opened American headquarters for the company at 81 New Street, New York, N. Y. E. Harms, for the past 16 years inn charge of metallurgical operations of the Torreon, Mexico; lead and copper smelter, has resigned and is now located at El Paso, Tex.

Jan 8, 1918

By Robert F. Mehl

EXTENSION of physical and chemical methods of research in the study of metallic behavior continues rapidly, particularly in the correlation of behavior with crystal structure, and in the analysis of elastic and plastic properties. The growth of the science of metals during 1933 calls for special comment; the need for special reviews and for textbooks and monographs is now acute, as might he supposed from the number of references appended to this article, a list which is much abbreviated.

Jan 1, 1934

By V. V. J. Sarma

Interpretation of earth resistivity data involves not only obtaining depth to interfaces but also determining the nature of formations from their resistivity characteristics. Moore's method of interpretation envisages obtaining depths to the interfaces alone. A simple method of estimating the true resistivity values of formations by applying Hummel's formula of average resistivities is proposed. The method would increase the interpretative value of Moore's method as originally proposed. For most of the earth resistivity measurements, the four-electrode configuration developed by Wennerl is employed. In principal, the method consists of energizing (Current I) the ground through two outer electrodes and measuring the resultant potential (v) between the two inner electrodes. The configuration is such that the separation (a) between any two successive electrodes is equal. The apparent resistivity (pa) for such a configuration is given by 2p- a (V/I). By increasing the electrode separation (pa vs a) curves are obtained. Ideally, a homogeneous isotropic formation underground has a characteristic resistivity. However, the field conditions do not present such ideal cases. Almost invariably, even in the same geological bed, the physical conditions are widely different at different parts in the bed. It is further shown that the penetration of the current into the ground for a given horizontal electrode separation, a, is roughly down to a depth, equal to a. It is therefore, evident that the apparent resistivity calculated from the field observations is a weighted average of the resistivities of the materials present down to this depth. With some prior knowledge about the relative dispositions of the geological formations and their physical conditions, it would be possible, by resistivity surveys, to obtain characteristic resistivities for these formations. It is, thus, that the apparent resistivity-electrode separation curves enable one to decipher the resis- tivity distribution at various depth levels and therefore the nature of the geological formations present. Both empirical and theoretical methods have been developed for determining resistivity characteristics of the various formations. The theoretical methods proposed by Tagg2 and Roman3 are derived from studies of the potential distribution on the surface due to the presence of layers of widely differing resistivities underground. The more recent methods of Wetzel and McMurry4 and Wetzel and Mooney5 are but extensions of the original Roman method of superposition. These methods suffer from lack of similarity of the actual field conditions with those of assumed conditions in developing the theory. The empirical methods such as the one developed by Gish and rooneY6 depend purely on personal observation and local peculiarities, and are applicable only for those limited areas. Out of the empirical methods, moore's7 cumulative resistivity method is still found to be applicable in several localities of differing conditions. While Reudy in 1945 adduced some theoretical justification for the method (Eve and Keys),8 Muskat9 and Mooney 10 tried to show the lack of theoretical basis for the same. It is, however, observed that the method in practice "forms a valuable means of successfully attacking the apparent resistivity curves which fail to respond to the Gish-Rooney, the Tagg or the Roman logarithmic methods" (Ramachandra Rao). 11 Comparatively good results are also reported by Melbyel2 by employing Moore's method in interpreting the resistivity results obtained for ground water in the city of Gunnison, Colo. MOORE'S METHOD As has already been pointed out, the application of the theoretical methods is time-consuming, laborious and sometimes not applicable for quick and accurate interpretation of the field data. moore7 has developed a quick method for obtaining depths to interfaces by plotting the cumulative sums of resistivities, against the corresponding electrode separations a instead of plotting the usual Pa — a curve. In this process of continuous integration, corrections for small variations in resistivities, arising due to local surface conditions or adjacent layers, are made, while large consistent variations are brought out

Jan 1, 1963

By Duane E. Eubanks, David B. McDonald

The anticipated growth of western coal production over the next decade is expected to add approximately 274.3 million t/y (302.4 million stpy) to US capacity. The increased output, coming from both new mines and expansion of existing facilities, promises to bring with it a new set of problems for mine planners.

Jan 8, 1976

H. W. NICHOLS, Secretary-Treasurer, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Ill. , R. S. BONSIB, H. B. PULSIFER, . HORACE H. CLARK, H. T. WALSH. Seventy-four members of' the two organizations attended a three-day joint field meeting of the Chicago Section and the Illinois Mining Institute at La Salle, Ill., on May 17, 18 and 19. The meeting began with a technical session in the rooms of the Illinois

Jan 7, 1917

By AIME AIME

AN outstanding session of the Annual February Meeting was one held under the joint auspices of several groups on Tuesday afternoon, Feb. 22, as a symposium on the question of preserving peace in the postwar era through the control of the supply of sundry minerals vital to the Axis nations. D. H. McLaughlin and R. C. Allen were associate chairmen. And C.K. Leith led the discussion.

Jan 1, 1944

PRESIDENTS DAVID THOMAS 1871 R W RAYMOND 1872-1874 A L HOLLEY1875 ABRAM S HEWITT 1876 T STERRY HUNT 1877 ECKLEY B COXE 1878 - 1879 WILLIAM P SHINN 1880 WILLIAM METCALF 1881 RICHARD P ROTHWELL 1882 ROBERY W HUNT 1883 JAMES C, BAYLES 1884-1885 ROBERT H RICHARDS 1886 THOMAS EGLESTON 1887 WILLIAM B POTTER 1888 RICHARD PEARCE 1889 ADAM S HEWITT 1890 JOHN BIRKINBINE 1891-1892

Jan 1, 1923

PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR DONALD B. GILLIES CLEVELAND, OHIO PAST PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS R. C. ALLEN CLEVELAND, OHIO D. C. TACKLING SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. TREASURER AND DIRECTOR KARL EILERS NEW YORK, N. Y. VICE-PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS H. G. MOULTON NEW YORK, N. Y. HARVEY S. MUDD Los ANGELES, CALIF. PAUL -D. MERICA NEW YORK, N. Y. WILFRED SYKES CHICAGO, ILL. WILLIAM B. HEROY HOUSTON, TEXAS HENRY KRUMB NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 1, 1939

[James C. Gray, President W. B. Stephenson, President-Elect A. B. Cummins, Past-President E. G. Fox, Eastern Regional Vice-President H. C. Weed, Western Regional Vice-President Donald W. Scott, Central Regional Vice-President John Cameron Fox, Secretary 29 W. 39 Street New York 18, N. Y. After September 7, 1961 345 East 47 Street, New York 17, N. Y. D. R. Tone, Assistant Secretary Nathaniel Arbiter, Treasurer]

Jan 1, 1961

[THE BLAST FURNACE Blast Furnace U. S.A., M. O. Holowaty, and C. M. Squarcy Part I - Colonial Ironmakers (JOURNAL OF METALS, May, 1957)3 Part II - The Age of Mineral Coal (JOURNAL OF METALS, July, 1957) 9 Part III - From Falling Creek to Zug Island (JOURNAL OF METALS, October, 1957 17 Sterling, Ringwood, and Greenwood, R. W. Shearman and F. Weston Starratt (JOURNAL OF METALS, September, 1959) 23]

Jan 1, 1961

PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR JOHN R. SUMAN HOUSTON, TEXAS PAST PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS DONALD B. GILLIES CLEVELAND, OHIO H.- G. MOULTON NEW YORK, N.Y. TREASURER AND DIRECTOR KARL -EILERS SEA CLIFF, N. Y. VICE-PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS W. B. HENRY HOUSTON, TEXAS HENRY KRUMB NEW YORK, N. Y. ERIE V. DAVELER , NEW YORK N Y W. M PEIRCE PALMERTON, PA. PAUL D. MERICA NEW YORK, N. Y. LEROY SALSICH DULUTH, MINN.

Jan 1, 1941

PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR R. C. ALLEN . CLEVELAND, OHIO PAST PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS H. A. BUEHLER ROLLA, Mo. JOHN M. LOVEJOY NEW YORK, N. Y. VICE-PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND DIRECTOR KARL EILERS NEW YORK, N. Y. VICE-PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS HENRY KRUMB NEW YORK, N. Y. PAUL D. MERICA NEW YORK, N. Y. H. G. MOULTON NEW YORK, N. Y. HARVEY S. MUDD Los ANGELES, CALIF. WILFRED SYKES CHICAGO, ILL..

Jan 1, 1937

PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR JOHN M LOVEJOY NEW YORK, N. Y PAST PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS HOWARD N EAVENSON PITTSBURGH, PA HENRY A BUEHLER ROLLA, MO. VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND DIRECTOR KARL EILERS NEW YORK, N Y VICE PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS LOUIS S CATES NEW YORK N Y PAUL D MERICA NEW YORK, N Y WILFRED SYKES CHICAGO, ILL R C ALLEN CLEVELAND, OHIO HENRY KRUMB NEW YORK, N Y

Jan 1, 1937

PROF RICHARD ÅKERMAN Stockholm, Sweden ANDREW CARNEGIR New York, N.Y. DR. JAMES DOUGLAS New York, N.Y. PROF HATON DE LA GOUPILLIERE Paris, France R.A. HADFIELD Sheffield England PROF HANS HOEFER Leoben, Austria PROF HENRI LOUIS LE CHATELIER Paris France M FLORIS OSMOND Paris, France JOHN E. STEAD Middlesborugh, England PROF DIMITRY CONSTANTIN TSCHERNOFF St Petersburg, Russia CHARLES D WALCOT Washingtion D.C. PROF DR HERMANN WEDDING Berlin, Germany

Jan 1, 1910

Upper Peninsula W. O. HOTCHKISS, Chairman C. H. BAXTER, Secretary-Treasurer, Michigan College of Mining and Technology, Houghton, Mich. S. R. ELLIOTT RUDOLPH ERICSON W. H. SCHACHT Utah Meets second Thursday of each month, October to May, inclusive B. L. SACKETT, Chairman C. T. VAN WINKLE, Vice-chairman G. L. OLDRIGHT, Secretary-Treasurer, U. S. Bureau of Mines, Salt Lake City, Utah A. E. RING L. A. WALKER

Jan 1, 1932

T. H Aldrich '96 Walter H. Aldridge '89 R M. Atrater, Jr '97 James B Bailey '00 Samuel Barker, Jr. '00 John F Berry '93 Charles A Bohn '93 H. A Brassert '99 Victor B. Buck '98 Frederick Burbidge '87 Frederick P Burrall '97 John Cabot, Jr '99 William McC. Cameron '97 W Gaston Caperton '94 Norman Carmichael '99 Alvin B. Carpenter '97 Charles A Chase '00

Jan 1, 1952

PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR JOHN M. LOVEJOY NEW YORK, N. Y. PAST PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS HOWARD N. EAVENSON PITTSBURGH, PA. HENRY A. BUEHLER ROLLA, Mo. VICE-PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND DIRECTOR KARL EILERS NEW YORK, N. Y. VICE-PRESIDENTS AND DIRECTORS LOUIS S. CATES NEW YORK, N. Y. PAUL D. MERICA NEW YORK, N. Y. WILFRED SYKES CHICAGO, ILL. R. C. ALLEN CLEVELAND; OHIO HENRY KRUMB NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 1, 1936