Search Documents

By M. L. Mendes, J. Q. Nojiri, S. C. Botelho, A. P. Campanha

In February 28, 2001 JOULE coordinated the first tests with an electronic detonator in South America at an iron ore operation - ITABIRA MINES from the Brazilian COMPANHIA VALE DO RIO DOCE (CVRD) - the largest producer and exporter of iron ore in the world. ITABIRA MINES (CAU and CONCEI O) belong to one of the complexes, called the Southern System, producing 56 million tons of ROM as well as concentrated products and pellets. This paper is going to describe the tests at ITABIRA MINES with results indicating the improvement in the excavator productivity and reduction of the mining global costs (due to the better performance of the equipment and potential reduction of the maintenance cost).

Jan 1, 2002

By Ken Tunnel

In the spring of 2005, the Lake Superior Chapter of the ISEE invited me to speak about raw materials used for blasting, anhydrous ammonia and the effect of this important feedstock on the cost of ammonium nitrate.The invitation was extended because our company is involved in trading ammonia and the production of ammonium nitrate. In a response to a request to update that presentation, it struck me how events such as hurricanes Katrina and Rita can change the landscape of our businesses.

Jan 1, 2007

By Adrian Moore, Alan Richards

Time window techniques that limit the explosive charge mass being fired within a specified time window (commonly 8 milliseconds (ms)) have been used for many years and are widely accepted by explosives engineers. The 8 ms time window may be relevant for controlling ground vibration for small blasts at close quarters in a high frequency vibration environment. For controlling ground vibration from blasts in a low frequency vibration environment an 8 ms separation between blastholes is arbitrary and meaningless. The 8 ms time window was never intended as a means of controlling airblast. The use of time window techniques will, in many instances, result in airblast and ground vibration levels that are substantially greater than planned, with unfortunate outcomes. The uses of time windows that are inappropriate have been well explained in previous papers. This paper gives further examples of blast designs that satisfied time window considerations but have resulted in substantially greater airblast and ground vibration levels in certain directions, due to wavefront reinforcement or the combined effect of drilling pattern and delay sequence. Techniques that identify wavefront reinforcement, due to the combined effect of drilling pattern and delay sequence, can assist explosives engineers to avoid blast vibration problems that result from inappropriate time window techniques.

Jan 1, 2002

By Virgil J. Stachura, Larry R. Fletcher

The Bureau of Mines conducted a series of delayed blasting experiments at a West Virginia contour coal mine which resulted in smoother highwalls. The highwalls were smoother due to reduced overbreak and inherently safer due to reduced likelihood of rockfall. Reduced overbreak was accomplished by an increase in the highwall hole delay intervals which changed the effective delay pattern geometry and the direction of burden movement. Three combinations of blast delay intervals in the highwall holes were tested: 1) 50 ms longer than the nominal design, 2) 50- and 100-ms longer delays in the nearest two rows that form the highwall, and 3) 100 ms longer than the nominal design. The mine's nominal blast design was a flat vee formed by 17-ms surface delays between holes and 42-ms surface delays between rows, with 200-ms in-the-hole delays. All three test designs produced highwall improvements over the nominal design with only occasional exceptions because of geologic variations.

Jan 1, 1985

This paper describes the circuit simulations based on SPICE of the SDI Electronic Detonator System at the system level. SDI is launching the Electronic Detonator System with a robust serial protocol exhibiting great ease in field usability and deployment. Programmable delay time with increment of 1 ms up to 10s is possible. Bus length of up to 2 km containing 1600 detonators can be utilized. This system was analyzed using SPICE simulations and an Excel-based firing model spreadsheet. The effects of wire diameter, resistivity, detonator leakage characteristics, blasting array topology (lumped, linearly distributed or branched) were simulated using the firing model. Such spreadsheet is instrumental in determining the blasting topology of any given detonator number and bus wire diameter or resistivity. Initial simulation results were interactively coupled back into making the serial protocol more robust during typical mining conditions.

Jan 1, 2006

By C. Kosloski, E. McCullough, A. Fox, S. Reed

This paper serves as a reference guide for creating or strengthening student chapters of the International Society of Explosives Engineers. This includes chapters that are just starting, currently undergoing transition in leadership, or that are in the process of rebuilding. ISEE student chapters have great potential to increase student involvement and national membership, and can benefit from formalized strategies to help them do so. Several key strategies are introduced and should be employed to promote organizational participation throughout the university system.

Jan 1, 2016

By Andrew F. McKown

This paper will discuss the mechanisms of potential damage from close-in construction blasting, concentrating on two mechanisms: elastic ground vibrations and non-elastic (permanent) ground deformations. The latter will be shown to be the most dangerous for close-in blasting. With respect to elastic ground vibrations, discussion will center on the differences in vibration frequencies and impacts between typical close-in construction blasting and typical mine and quarry blasts, and how using vibration criteria derived for residential structures near mines can lead to very conservative criteria for close-in construction blasting. The effects of high frequency vibrations seen in close-in blasting will be commented on. Factors affecting the magnitude of ground motions will be discussed. Simple, practical techniques will be presented to minimize the potential for damage from close-in blasting, by minimizing the potential for rock block movement or ground heave. Case histories will be presented to illustrate some of the techniques discussed, and give examples of successful close-in blasting projects.

Jan 1, 1991

By James G. Stuart, Tassilo N. Baur

We will discuss the kind of procedure that we use to predict the no-fire (for safety) and all-fire (for reliability) current levels for any given type electric detonator. The basic idea is to expose several detonators to different levels of electric current, so we can estimate the probability of firing as a function of current. We call this a statistical firing test. But what about the uncertainty in measuring the current? Suppose we are not quite sure what stimulus level we apply? This is the question that we will consider here. This relates to both safety and reliability. Surprisingly enough, we will find that some uncertainty in measuring the levels during our statistical firing test improves our long-term safety and reliability

Jan 1, 2019

By Dale Preece, Stephen Chung, D. Scott Scovira

The DMC_BLAST (Distinct Motion Code) has been developed to model rock motion and displacement during the gas expansion phase after the detonation of an explosive in a borehole. Recently, a designated delay firing order algorithm was written into the DMC_BLAST code. The model can now be used to analyze rock mass displacement for a V-cut, center opening, or sinking cut initiation sequences. This new feature allows the investigation of the effects of delay firing order on rock displacement when blasting complex inter-bedded and ore-waste structures. The model provides important ground movement and mixing indicators for dilution control in surface gold mining relative to the initiation sequences employed. Echelon blasts as compared to center opening type blasts show differences in their internal muckpile displacement. These displacement differences can be important to operations that mine narrow strike driven ore bodies. The model also has applications to through coal seam blasting and demonstrates that down-dip blasting is a better alternative than up-dip blasting. There is less disturbance to the dipping coal seam and less mixing of the rock and the coal.

Jan 1, 2000

By F. Malek

An extensive blast monitoring program has been carried out to study explosive performance and the effectiveness of blast designs in production blasts in a deep underground mine. Comprehensive monitoring of blasting vibrations through multi-station high-capacity high-frequency accelerometers, and borehole deformation history have been the main tools of such analysis. The mining activity involves relatively unstressed stopes as well as highly stressed stopes. More than 30 production blasts have been monitored, and the respective vibrations from close-range as well as distant seismic stations have been analyzed, and the vibration parameters (amplitude and frequency) have been correlated with explosive charge weight in the holes. It is found that the correlation between blasting rounds and the corresponding vibration amplitudes often have poor correlation for a very significant portion of the blasts. These point to either explosive charge malfunction in those specific blast holes, or inadequate blast design, or the effect of high in-situ stresses, or any combination thereof. This paper analyzes these variables and their effect on the overall blasting operation at the mine.

Jan 1, 2013

By W. Reisz

The fear of heights is a natural defense against performing a dangerous and unnatural act such as standing on the edge of a hundred foot wall. Yet through familiarity, a casual attitude often exists. Those of us, who work near highwalls on a daily basis, may become overly comfortable in our surroundings, losing sight of the disaster which may often rest a single misstep away. And this is where the hidden dangers lie.

Jan 1, 2009

By R Yang, D B. Kay

"Blast vibration control is of vital importance for tunnel blasting in urban environments. A vibration model with multiple seed waveforms (MSW) as input for a point of interest was developed in recent years by one of its authors. The MSW blast vibration model has been applied successfully in open cut and quarry blasting situations. From the literature, it appears that there may not be any seed wave-based vibration modelling work for tunnel blasting.A project was conducted to test the MSW model for tunnel blast vibration. A series of tunnel blast rounds were fired and tri-axial vibration waveforms from the blasts were recorded with several seismographs at distances ranging from 10 to 100 metres from the blasts. Seed waveforms were collected and the charge weight scaling law for the signature hole PPV were established.The MSW model is applied to tunnel blasting and specific issues associated with tunnel blast vibration addressed, such as variable effects of confinement and screening to vibration during a blast round. The capability of the model in terms of the PPV and frequency prediction is demonstrated in the paper. The paper demonstrates that the MSW blast vibration model is a useful tool for managing tunnel blast vibration with the potential to optimise round by round design in terms of managing the vibration below the limit while maximising tunnel advance rate."

Jan 1, 2011

By Joshua Hoffman, Rhys Baker, Tim O’Brien

Numerous agencies in the Executive Branch of the United States Federal Government have regulatory jurisdiction over the explosives industry. These agencies develop the rules by which the explosives industry must operate, and many have the authority to enforce those rules. Likewise, there are entities in the Legislature that have oversight of those agencies and develop the laws that agencies must operate under. These entities in the Legislative Branch are Congressional Committees. Each committee has their respective jurisdictional authority over various agencies and issues. There are several Congressional Committees with jurisdiction over the agencies that govern the explosives industry and they differ slightly between the House of Representatives and the Senate. This paper discusses this division of power as it relates to the explosives industry. Each branch is responsive to the public and the processes through which each promulgates regulation and legislation require public input in different forms. Options for civic involvement for engaging each of these bodies of power in their respective processes are presented. The differences between legislation and regulation are highlighted along with the processes by which each are promulgated. A proper understanding of the governmental mechanics that affect the explosives industry are critical for the industry to be able to be proactive in playing a role in these processes in a democratic way.

By D. Goodings, W. L. Fourney, Bonenberger, R., Uli Leiste

The problem of the maximum depth at which a mine buried in the surf zone or beach zone is a threat to landing vehicles is being studied by Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Indian Head Division, Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), and The University of Maryland Dynamic Effects Laboratory. The problem was divided into two parts: The first part involves determining how deep a pressure plate mine can be and still detect a vehicle passing over it. This requires determining the distribution of stress within dry and saturated sand when a vehicle passes over a buried mine. The results obtained from that study are presented in a related paper (1). This paper will cover the second part, which entails determining the impulse delivered to the vehicle. This is equivalent to determining the impulse delivered to a plate suspended above the detonating explosive charge and includes an investigation of the distribution of the impulse over the plate. The purpose of the research is to develop a scaling law and/or computational capability which will permit predicting impulse to be expected in the field from tests conducted in the lab. The computational effort is aimed at the development of and confidence in computer codes that can be used to predict stresses and strains in plates due to the detonation of buried mines.

Jan 1, 2004

By Michael S. Wieland

This report discusses measurement techniques utilized in and trend results obtained from research on delay blasting malfunctions in underground coal shots at the U.S. Bureau of Mines. Charge malfunctions occur during delay blasting in underground or surface mines, rendering the explosive operations more hazardous and less productive. Modern instrumentation techniques reveal several types of reduced charge performance, resulting from cross-hole interactions. Two receptor (wave-target) charge malfunctions were detected in fourteen shots that were undeniable. There were other receptor charges that exhibited under-performance by registering out-of-tolerance or noticeably reduced detonation rates. Delay blasting generates tremendous shock waves and rifting forces that fracture and heave the surrounding stratum and unfortunately damage remaining unfired charges. This report contains two graphs, representing roughly 1% of total records, that show donor (wave-source) charge shock waves and rift (reaction-to-heave) compressions. These debilitating wave impacts precipitate modes of reduced charge performance ranging from weak detonations or misfires to sympathetic detonations. As recognized from previous research, impaired charges react poorly, perform less useful work, and yield fumes with atypical higher toxicity.

Jan 1, 1995

By Cathy Aimone-Martin, Kristin Dunlap Kolden

Blasting was conducted for the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) in the Columbia River near Saint Helens, Oregon during 2009 and 2010 to deepen the navigation channel as a final phase of a dredging project to accommodate larger container ships. The Columbia River Channel Improvement Project (CRCI) required 4 months to blast and dredge 300,000 yd3 (229,366 m3) of basalt from the bottom of the channel to allow Post-Panamax vessels with drafts up to 50 ft (15.2 m) access to the Ports along the River. Explosives charges were limited to 90 lbs (40.8 kg) per delay for the protection of fish and marine life in the area. A fish mortality study and marine mammal monitoring program was also required by the Corps. Underwater overpressure monitoring was required for each blast and peak overpressures measured 10 ft (3.1 m) above the river bottom 140 ft (42.7 m) from the closest blast hole were not to exceed 70 psi (483 kPa) with a cautionary level of 40 psi (276 kPa). Specifications required sampling rates of 500k S/s and PCB Peizotronics tourmaline pressure sensors. The Corps granted permission to co-locate additional ceramic-type sensors at different sampling rates to design redundant monitoring systems 140 and 300 ft (42.7 and 91.4 m) from blasting and develop a site-specific overpressure attenuation model for the project. This paper presents the correlations of overpressure with cube-root scaled distance factors, a comparison of measurements using three different pressure sensor systems, and a discussion of blast design influence on overpressure measurements.

Jan 1, 2014

By Pierre DePasquale, Ricardo Chavez

Lowering of quarry energy consumption participates to answer both environmental and financial issues. The “EE-Quarry” European project, supported by the European Commission (EE stands for Energy Efficient), develops a new and highly effective modelling and monitoring Energy Management System technique to improve Energy Efficiency and move to a low CO2 emission rate in the nonmetallic mineral industry. Within this global quarry project, blast design, as the first link in the chain, has to be optimized in order to satisfy requirements of downstream operations. The authors have been developing and implementing an operational methodology using continuous field measurements and field adaptation methods for blast design. It drives the drilling and blasting work, aiming at a more energy efficient and environmentally friendly operation. Based upon actual local conditions (rock-mass assessment, face geometry, borehole deviations, etc.), blast patterns are optimized through a specific hole-by-hole blast design software. It provides a better and more consistent energy distribution, to achieve a better rock fragmentation, while avoiding explosive overconsumption. The software also calculates total energy inputs and the drilling and blasting contribution to Greenhouse Effect. Coupled with methodical fieldwork and variable density explosives, it has been leading to a real reduction in energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions. As the project is now reaching its final stage, demonstrations were conducted in various quarries around Europe. Several simulations were carried out and compared to the site data, in order to propose enhancements for the different phases (extraction, loading, hauling, crushing and transport) while bearing in mind the environmental impact of the quarry. This blasting methodology allows to assess the carbon footprint of drilling and blasting in conjunction with the downstream operations, thus to evaluate the global carbon footprint of quarrying. Copyright ©

Jan 1, 2015

By Andrew Ritter, Victor I. Montenyohl, Stephen R. Winzer

Thirty-seven open pit production blasting operations have been monitored using high-speed cameras running between 500 and 7000 frames per second. Analysis of the resulting films reveals irregularities in timing including sequencing errors and crowding (holes firing less than 8 ms apart), confirming results of laboratory testing of ms delay blasting caps (Winzer, 1978). Where blasting parameters are otherwise constant and within recommended guidelines (stemming, spacing, burden, etc.), timing problems dominate the overall performance of the blasting operation. Model tests in layered Homalite 100, designed to simulate joint or bedding planes in rock, indicate the importance of the stress waves generated by the explosive in developing the crack network which is ultimately responsible for the fragmentation seen in the resulting muckpile. These mechanisms are strongly supported by high-speed film studies at Pinesburg, Maryland. Experiments in controlling relief in deep shots (where depth approaches the lateral extent of the bench blasted) using borehole geometry and hybrid initiation systems (electronic timer and pyrotechnic delays) were carried out. The results suggest that the 1 me/ft. of burden guideline developed by Bergmann et aI., 1974 is too short, and that much longer times are necessary to optimize fragmentation and muck digability. Longer times are found to reduce noise, vibration, and flyrock.

Jan 1, 1979

By D Maxwell Ellett

This report presents an evaluation of knowledge concerning a process used in predicting ground motion resulting from large scale conventional explosive detonations, The shots were set off in Arizona in connection with copper ore recovery activities.

Jan 1, 1976

By Ralph E. Burnham, J. Kelly Ratliff

"The words “dynamite,” “TNT,” “explosives,” and “blasting” typically cause the general public, andjurors, apprehension and fear. Although blasting operations conducted by well-trained, skilled, andexperienced blasters rarely cause damage or injury, the public’s perception of blasting is that it isdangerous, disruptive, and results in damage to nearby properties. As a result, blasting operations have always resulted in complaints, claims, and lawsuits. However, in recent years, the public perception combined with an increase in public opposition, social media, more stringent regulations, predatory plaintiffs’ attorneys, and the application of strict liability to blasting claims has resulted in an increased threat of litigation to blasting companies and individual blasters. Consequently, many blasting companies find themselves receiving more complaints, involved in more litigation, and facing an alarming number of frivolous claims, which can result in increased insurance costs and other financial tolls. Accordingly, today’s blasting companies must be prepared for litigation and take steps to eliminate accidents and claims before the first shot is detonated on a job. The best way to accomplish this is standard operating procedures that incorporate best management practices, industry standards, and regulations in daily operations. This paper outlines some of the considerations that a blasting company should incorporate into its standard operating procedures before, during, and after the shot."

Jan 1, 2016