Search Documents

By B J. Kennedy, G W. Sengstock

During the last two decades, many advances have been made in open cut coal mining technology as new mines have come on stream and old mines have faced increasingly difficult mining and operational conditions. The need for close control of operating costs has necessitated consideration of modified excavation methods.

Jan 1, 1995

By Michael Swisdak, John Tatom

In a quantitative risk assessment (QRA), the ability to accurately model real-world situations is obviously critical. In the end, the model must be able to represent the effects produced by the detonation of the donor and the consequences on the target. The science that goes into such a model must be carefully thought-out and based on as much data as possible.

Jan 1, 2007

By J R. Phin

The properties of all available modern blasting initiation techniques are reviewed. Primadets are nonelectric initiators, the nonelectric features of the system eliminates concern of premature initiation from static or stray currents. The loading techniques are simple and a minimum of training is required. There is no limitation in the number of necessary sequences in which the Primadet need be connected for initiation. This flexibility improves vibration control,and often reduces costs due to increased fragmentation.

Jan 1, 1975

By Theodore C. Hile, Floyd P. Henry, Ken Gragg

"Conventional explosive-storage methods usually rely on combinations of earth and concrete barriers, along with sufficient distance between limited explosive loads, to avoid accidental conflagration. However, under many circumstances, Air National Guard (ANG) facilities co-located with civilian airfields have trouble meeting necessary Quantity-Distance (Q-D) requirements for Explosive Hazard Class/Division 1.1 and 1.4 materials. Because of the danger posed by explosives stored in earthcovered magazines (ECMs) too close to civilian activities, ANG units often find itdifftcult to maintain adequate stores of ordnance needed to meet unit mission goals."

Jan 1, 1999

By Baron Fidler, Dave Lilly, Matt Budin

Cumulative sum (CUSUM) statistical process control methods have been used in many industries to monitor quality control results. CUSUM charts are a method to determine when small changes in data indicate a major change in results. E.S. Page at AT&T developed the method in 1954. In many blasting situations, vibration and air blast readings vary slightly from blast to blast. Whether the change is significant or not can be hard to interpret from the raw data. CUSUM charts can assist in determining whether a major change is taking place and when the change began.

Jan 1, 2009

By Dale Preece, Stephen Chung

The DMC-BLAST (Distinct Motion Code) has been developed for modeling bench blasting to one or two free faces such as choked blasting in surface gold operation and cast blasting in coal mining, respectively. This computer code has been used to assist the analysis of rock mass displacement after a blast was initiated in an orderly delay sequence. Applications of this feature can be found in the studies of dilution control in surface mining of gold as well as coal involving complex rock structures. Recently, DMC-BLAST has been modified to include a designated delay firing order coupled with variable rock strengths in the blasted media. This newly added feature allows the investigation of the effects of delay firing order on rock displacement in blasting a complex interbedded ore-waste structure. Examples of blasting a steeply dipping coal seams and bedded rock structure, especially in coal mining operations will be addressed and the comparison of efficiency in blasting in an up-dip as opposed to blasting in a down-dip direction will be discussed. Also covered in the paper is a new application of DMC-Blast to simulate a stope blasting underground. Simulations of blasting in a few selected types of timing/structure combinations will be presented in this paper.

Jan 1, 2000

By W. Reisz

Dealing with misfires can be one of the most difficult and serious issues that blasters must confront. Most of us will - at some point, have to deal with a misfire situation.

Jan 1, 2009

By Tristan Worsey, John Henchion, Nathan Rouse, Yannick Lauras

"This paper presents an approach used to plan and evaluate drill and blast trials for a mine that currently mechanically excavates in-situ rock. The document presents the approach used to plan the trials, the key performance indicators (KPIs) that were necessary to evaluate the mining methods, the test matrix used during the trials, and the results of the trials. The trials, which occurred as part of an overall drill to mill optimization project at this site, helped to evaluate various blast designs using fragmentation results,drilling and blasting costs, and downstream costs. This project was unique in that (1) drill and blast methods were trialed on multiple rock types and various bench heights using a range of blasthole diameters and powder factors and (2) the load and haul costs were evaluated using a range of loading equipment, from 66 tonne (73 ton) excavators up to 250 tonne (276 ton) excavators. A ten year net cost financial evaluation of the material extraction alternatives was also prepared for the site management. Ultimately, the process of evaluating the drill and blast trials helped the management decide whether to continue extracting using mechanical methods or to introduce drill and blast methods to extract the rock."

Jan 1, 2017

By Alan Tordoir, Mark Roberts

The drill and blast process is a critical function within the production cycle which significantly impacts the ability of an operation to effectively meet its safety and production targets. Acknowledging that D&B design and reconciliation practices were conducted inconsistently across operations, a Group wide initiative was launched to embed a standardized design and reconciliation platform in line with the company’s Operating Model principles. A technical system was selected to deliver the digitalization of critical D&B information and enable ‘analyze and improve’ routines for design compliance monitoring and downstream productivity optimization.

Jan 1, 2019

By Robert Cefalo

Drill and Blast Engineer Abstract In 2019, the Bingham Canyon Mine, owned by Rio Tinto Kennecott Utah Copper Company, mined through the active underground that dewaters the pit. The active underground required the limitation of vibrations to avoid catastrophic damage or damage that would require work to the shotcrete and additional roof support. The surface design of the current sector next to and through portions of the active underground. The drill and blast group was required to test site law vibration parameters to ensure that vibration limitations were lower than limits set by the underground management team. Seismographs were used to validate the vibration prediction model and check performance of blast in areas of the underground. The bench conditions and limited pounds-per-delay created large obstacles for the blasting team, making it difficult for them to accurately load the pattern with the number of decks in the blast. Methods were used to improve the loading instructions and ensure that each hole achieved pound requirements based off of the distance to the underground that it was designed to protect. The project evolved from start to finish, and the process to estimate distances and loading improved to make the blast a more repeatable process for the size of the project.

By Alan Bauer

During the past several years, the trend to large-diameter blastholes in both open pits and underground mines along with the continuing developments in slurried explosives and delay systems has kept things exciting for the drilling and blasting engineer. This has been particularly so in underground mining, where new mining systems having lower cost and higher productivity have emerged. Crater technology has produced new large-scale methods for resisting front penetration in tar sand mining and also new underground retreat mining methods and methods of raising.

Jan 1, 1978

By Sarah Guzzelli, Enrigue Munaretti, Anneliese Botelho, Jair Koppe

Drill and Blast (D & B) is one of the main operations in the mining production cycle, which aims to fragment rock according to a pre-defined plan for proper loading, haulage and processing specifications. In this sense, data from a Brazilian iron ore mine was analyzed, given emphasis on blasthole length, subdrilling and stemming. The D & B report, including mining data such as number of blastholes, length, and diameter and stemming aspects, was analyzed in order to be able to compare these results with the blast design. The study showed significant differences between the designed blasting pattern and that one obtained by the operation. As a consequence, problems such as inadequate fragmentation, incorrect size distribution and loss of energy, were identified. For example, when stemming has a different length than it should have, noise and flyrock can occur, including inadequate fragmentation and vibration in both situations. Therefore, a comparison between the usual D & B procedures and recommended D & B design based on literature reveals the most important deviations and their consequences. The study intends to identify solutions for simple problems, improving D & B operations and safety practices.

Jan 1, 2014

By Eddie L. Catbagan

The Escalante silver-bearing deposit, consisting of a relatively wide and continuous quartz vein, contains openings ranging from minute to a few feet wide on the footwall and hanging wall. These openings (water courses or vug holes) are I believed to have been created by the fluctuation of the water table.

Jan 1, 1983

By Laurence Neufville

Proper risk assessment and blast design are very desirable to the execution of a blast. Not only will this ensure that it achieves its desired outcome, but the probability of complaints and litigation will be reduced. Blasting engineers rely heavily on site-specific data for analysis and input to the blast design equations, and therefore data collection is critical to this process. The traditional approach to data collection is to carry out site-specific reconnaissance by visiting the site, but the time spent doing so can be reduced if a remote sensing approached is adopted.

Jan 1, 2009

By Krishna Nand

For assessing the safety of structures during underground explosions, ground particle velocity gives the best damage criteria, and 100 mm/see of ground particle velocity has been internationally accepted as the threshold value of safety (no damage). Results of extensive controlled underground explosion experiments conducted by the author to study the effects of ground vibrations on specially prepared concrete blocks, and also on low rise buildings and dams showed that no damage normally occurred when ground particle velocities were less than 100 mm/sec. Analysis of a large number of accelerograms from a dam site in India also indicated that no damage occurred to normal structures when integrated ground particle velocities were less than 100 mm/sec. Major damage in well built structures like a dam was noticed for ground particle velocity as high as about 350 mm/sec. These results are also generally substantiated from damage data obtained for various structures during other earthquakes, including Elcentro (1940), Taft (1952), Parkfield (1965), and San Fernando (1971). These studies, therefore, suggest that the damage criteria during underground explosions and earthquakes are similar; and 100 mm/see of ground particle velocity seems to be the general threshold value of safety (no damage) against ground vibrations.

Jan 1, 1988

By Shijie Qu, Paul N. Worsey

Pre-splitting has become widely adopted for the formation and protection of final surface rock excavation profiles in both large scale civil construction and highway rock cuts. Jointing has been shown to affect the success of pre-splitting and the smoothness of the resulting profile, however, only closed joints have been investigated. Frequently jointing that is closed at depth is open at and near the surface due to weathering, reduced stresses and ground water percolation. In many instances, problems are associated with surface rock layers whereas at depth these problems are either reduced or do not exist.

Jan 1, 1987

By Dave Harrison, Phyllis Hasser, Ken Eltschlager

The beginning There was the video:– “Understanding Vibrations from Blasting” – 2002 to 2004 in development – Dale Ramsey ad hoc Public Education committee chair – Available At the ISEE bookstore Public Education and Public Relations Committee • Standing ISEE committee 2004 • Co-Chairs – Ken Eltschlager, Dave Harrison • Purpose: "Develop and conduct programs on public education and public relations. Public education programs will focus on public awareness, understanding, and appreciation of the explosives industry. Public relations programs will concentrate on providing blasting professionals with the tools to assist in the public's understanding of the explosive industry and in the appropriate ways to respond to local community issues."

Jan 1, 2007

By W. J. Birch

The recording of information is critical to the blasting process, whether it be for planning purposes, statutory requirements or environmental compliance. The review and analysis of past data can play a key part in a blast.s design. Statutory records must be held to preserve operational licenses and well-maintained monitoring records are a vital defence for today.s litigious society. However a single blasting event can be responsible for generating vast amounts of data. This information maybe collected pre or post-blast and in their individual ways may have a requirement to be logged, processed, analysed, reviewed and reported before eventually being archived.

Jan 1, 2002

By Joseph Meyers

Explosives techniques and technology are constantly evolving and improving, yet basic communication and business skills are not being used regularly. Many potential blasting projects never occur due to simplistic, basic factors, such as a lack of communication. Articulate communication is the key component in the blast approval process, which has changed remarkably from how business was conducted fifty years ago. Imperative to the approval process is communication outlining the safety and benefits of the blasting project. Information and transparency with the stakeholders and the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) will greatly improve the chances of having a blasting project approved. This open communication starts at the inception of the project when the memorandum of understanding (MOU) is obtained, and involves the AHJ through all steps of the approval process. The blasting industry and regulators must work collaboratively to improve safety, security, regulations and licensing. Implementing state of the art blasting techniques, security, safety measures, vibration monitoring and strict licensing allows the AHJ and all stakeholders to remain integrated and informed, contributing to process approval. Regulatory operators should strive to achieve success thru communication, cooperation and compliance which is accomplished thru continued education and transparency. These steps, combined with regular meetings, has proven to be a benefit to both industry and regulators. Relationships are built through trust, teamwork, transparency and communication –including the take holders and AHJ in the approval process from the inception solidifies these relationships and improves teamwork

By Paul Worsey, Terry Nixon

The development and testing of a simple mechanical stemming aid (Patents pending) resulting from a Joint venture by Incubator Technologies Inc. and the University of Missouri-Rolla and funded by the U.S. Department of Energy is described. The aid comprises a solid unit placed in the stemming above the explosive column and is designed to improve blasting efficiency and reduce drilling and blasting costs. It works with back filled drill cuttings or any other suitable stemming material.

Jan 1, 1988