Search Documents

By Sean Cahill

The Blasting In the summer of 1999, a Southern California drilling and blasting company conducted blasting as part of the grading operations at the Highlands Ranch development in San Diego, California. Highlands Ranch was a new single family residential project located near older residential properties in the area. Blasting was necessary to remove indigenous meta-volcanic rock associated with the local geology.

Jan 1, 2003

By Mario Coderre, Andre Pinsonnault, Francois Lefebvre, Pierre Groleau, Yves Newman, Christian Pouliot

"This paper describes the blasting methods used to excavate the tailrace channel at theLaforge hydroelectric plant. It also shows the importance and versatility of the dopedemulsion explosives used in this project."

Jan 1, 1993

By Lawson J. Taylor, Paul N. Worsey

Recent reputable evidence conclusively indicates that conventional chemical delay elements in delay detonators are notoriously inaccurate and can thus seriously affect blasting efficiency.

Jan 1, 1983

By Brett Pielstick, E Emery Gray

"Construction of the new Acosta Bridge in downtown Jacksonville, FL required the removalof an historical center lift span bridge once one_half of the new bridge had been opened totraffic. This paper discusses the potential problems faced with the demolition phase of the projectas observed by the CEI (Construction Engineering Inspection) and the blasting consultants"

Jan 1, 1993

By P N. Blakey

The base metal orebody of Texasgulf Canada Ltd. was mined initially by open pit. Conventional mining techniques were followed underground, but experimentation showed that open pit methods of drilling and blasting could be adapted. This paper deals with the consequent development of blasting techniques to suit underground stope design and damage criteria, in a large tonnage operation.

Jan 1, 1978

By Richard B. O'Meara

"The demand by a customer to an Explosives supplier to fulfill a specialised productrequirement was met by a level headed decision to try to satisfy that demand. This paperwill describe the fundamental steps required in order to develop and produce a newexplosives device, while under certain resource constraints, such that the needs of thecustomer and the supplier are met safely and effectively."

Jan 1, 1993

By Florian B. Janoski

The annual consumption of electric blasting caps in the United States approaches 100,000,000, so, over the last eleven to twelve years about one billion have been used. The author has made hazard assessment measurements in connection with proposed electric blasting operations in many places: under a giant, operating electrical generating station, under some of the highest voltage power lines in the country, and around many large electrical distribution substations. Electric blasting was safely conducted in all instances. Measurements of stray current, and of pickup under high voltage power lines are easily made, but it was always a more complex chore to make a good radio frequency hazard assessment "close in" to a high power RF transmitting source.

Jan 1, 1977

By Paul V. Sterk

"As vital as arteries are to sustaining life in the human body so are free flowing raises to thelife of an underground multiple level mine such as the Homestake Gold Mine. These raisesor boreholes are the artery system thru which the ore must pass to a point where it can behoisted from the mine. Through the history of underground mining miners have usedvertical or inclined raises to gravity transfer ore from level to level. Invariably, these raisesor boreholes will hangup and stop the flow of ore. These hangups are costly in terms of lostproduction, lost efficiency, and the inherent exposure danger to personnel who mustdislodge these hangups while being exposed to unsupported ground."

Jan 1, 1993

By Richard A. Dick

On August 3, 1977 the 95th Congress passed Public Law 95-87, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. This Act created the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), which was given the responsibility of formulating regulations to implement the Act. This paper explains the rationale behind the specific provisions of the final blasting regulations, which were published in volume 44, No. 50 of the Federal Register, dated March 13, 1979. The major items covered by the regulations include preblasting surveys, blasting schedules, protection of the public, ground vibration limits, the scaled distance equation, airblast limits, blasting procedures, and record keeping. The regulations are designed to protect the safety and well-being of the public and to protect buildings and structures such as wells, pipelines, and storage facilities from damage.

Jan 1, 1979

By Roy Rose, Bruce Bowles, Wesley L. Bender

Numerous large diameter water wells are used to dewater the pit at the Sleeper Mine. Occasionally, a well will be located inside the boundaries of a blast. Although one might expect that wells so located would become inoperable due to blast-induced damage, in most instances this has not proven to be the case.

Jan 1, 1991

By Jerry R. Wallace

A systematic, team approach to pre-blast and on-going problem solving contributed to the successful completion of this indoor industrial construction blasting project.

Jan 1, 1995

By Alan R. Cameron, William W. Forsyth, Tom H. Kleine

In the production environment, the current limits of blasting are most often defined by the ability of the operator to drill blastholes from a planned collar location to the required toe location. Many problems which are initially described as deficiencies in blasting or support are directly related to drilling. The assessment of support performance and blasting efficiency must begin with a detailed examination of drilling practices.

Jan 1, 1995

By Henry P. Van Ormer

This paper discusses some basic fundamentals in compressed air system design and layouts that should always be considered in planning or evaluating a compressed air distribution system in Construction and Mining. Often times, mining operations use central air or "power house" type systems that more closely resemble a typical industrial or plant compressed air distribution system. This paper does not attempt to cover this type of system.

Jan 1, 1975

By Thomas E. Brown

With the ever increasing public sensitivity to our environment, the blasting industry can no longer be concerned with just drilling and blasting. Government regulations, augmented by public pressure, require that the industry must be more diligent in preventing spills, disposing of distressed products and packaging materials, controlling fumes and dust, preventing product contamination, developing environmental impact studies, and preventing unnecessary regulations. These liabilities in conjunction with those of vibration, air overpressure and flyrock will continue to greatly impact the industry.

Jan 1, 1995

By Norman Disley, David B. Counter, Lionel Hebert

Misfires in underground and surface production blasts can be costly. Costs can arise from loss of resource, production interruptions, having to redrill or otherwise refire the blast (a hazardous process at best), due to added secondary blasting or breakage, and/or from increased LHD maintenance costs attributable to poor fragmentation.

Jan 1, 1996

By J S. Kuszmaul

The economic development of modified in situ oil shale retorting will benefit from the ability to design a blasting scheme that creates a rubble bed of uniform permeability. Preparing such a design depends upon successfully predicting how a given explosive will break rock. Numerical models are used to make predictions of the extent of damage caused by an explosion.

Jan 1, 1985

By Jack Eloranta

To improve control of blasting, tests were performed to assess non-electric cap accuracy. Simultaneous testing using a Velocity of Detonation Recorder (VODR), Red Lake LoCam and an Instantel DS-677 blast monitor was done. Favorable comparisons were found in the three records. This testing confirmed the accuracy of an inexpensive and expedient cap testing procedure.

Jan 1, 1992

By Steven V. Crum, Willard E. Pierce

Concern has been raised about the adequacy of current regulatory guidelines designed to protect homes from unwanted blast damage due to low frequency ground vibrations; in particular those with predominant frequencies below 6 Hz. This report summarizes and updates the preliminary results of a continuing Bureau of Mines investigation which will be completed later in 1995. Four structures at four different surface coal mines have been studied by examining their response to ground vibrations created from overburden blasting. House response to ground vibrations with dominant frequencies down to about 3 Hz were recorded. Many of the blasts produced ground vibrations with peak amplitudes above expected crack-producing thresholds. Response motions were compared to those predicted by theoretical single degree of-freedom response models.

Jan 1, 1995

By W. Reisz

Dealing with misfires can be one of the most difficult and serious issues that blasters must confront. Most of us will - at some point, have to deal with a misfire situation.

Jan 1, 2009

By Tom Donnelly, Roger C. Ilsley

Remote telecommunications seismographs were used to monitor blast vibrations at two historic structures in Cedarburg, Wisconsin during adjacent sewer line construction. The purpose of the vibration monitoring program at the historic structures was to maintain blast vibrations below limiting tolerances established by the Wisconsin State Historic Society.

Jan 1, 1991