Search Documents

By James Gayley

The development of blast-furnace practice in America in the direction of large yields is mainly the history of our working since the year 1880, as the advancement that has been made in the last decade is greater than that in the third of a century previous. A new era in the manufactnre of pig-iron began in 1880 with the putting in blast of the Edgar Thomson furnaces. These furnaces at once leaped to the front as pig-iron producers, and have maintained that position—with but one brief interruption—ever since. I shall, therefore, confine myself mainly to a description of these works, showing the changes in design and practice by which these results have been achieved. In order to show more clearly the progress that has been made since 1880, I shall refer briefly to the best work that was done in the ten years previous to that time. The Struthers furnace, in Ohio, was one of the first to attract attention in the matter of large outputs. This furnace was 55 feet high, 16 feet in diameter of bosh, 9 feet in the hearth, and about 8 feet 6 inches at the stock-line. The fuel was raw coal. This furnace, in December, 1871, made 1602

Jan 1, 1891

By Alfred E. Hunt, Geo. H. Clapp

The great advantage to he gained by a careful inspection of all materials used in construction, in regard to safety and permanency, and to accuracy of workmanship, has been longer recognized in Great Britain and on the Continent than in America. This is probably owing to the way in which great enterprises have been " rushed" in the United States. Time and cheap first cost, in too many instances, have been considered of more importance than absolute safety and durability; the structures being afterwards strengthened if this was found necessary. This has been most noticeable in railroads built through " new " country, where the object in view has been to reach the terminal point and get to work. These " loose " methods are now being very largely done away with, and a large proportion of the structures lately built are not only carefully inspected during the process of

Jan 1, 1891

By Edmund C. Pechin

THE writer approaches this subject with a great deal of diffidence —first, because it is utterly impossible to treat it satisfactorily within the limits of a paper, and, secondly, because the larger development is of so comparatively a recent date as to make authoritative data on some interesting points unavailable. For over one hundred years small charcoal-fnrnaces have been in existence, at widely scattered points, making a few tons of iron daily, and then gradually increasing to a daily output of, say 10 to 12 tons, as the market widened. With the exhaustion of local supplies of wood, inaccessibility to market, and sharp competition, bringing lower prices, many were compelled from time to time to make temporary stops, and finally to cease altogether. During the first half of the century there were at different times in operation between 75 and 90 charcoal furnaces. The last Directory of the Iron and Steel Works of the United States (1890) gives 19 as the number of charcoal-stacks in Virginia. Of these several are cold, and, it is

Jan 1, 1891

By C. B. Dudley

In October, 1878, and again in February, 1881, I had the honor to make public, through the medium of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, the results of an extended study of steel rails which had been in service, and which mere taken for the purpose from the tracks of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. These studies appeared in three papers. In the first of these papers the question. what kind of steel is least liable to fracture or disintegration in the track, was the principal one considered. In the second paper the question discussed was, does the power of steel to resist wear increase with the hardness ? In the third paper the relation between wear and the chemical and physical properties of the metal was the principal point considered. The general results arrived at, or the cooclusions reached, were, as follows: 1. That a mild steel is less liable to fracture, and if properly made, less liable to crushing or disintegration in the track than a harder steel. 2. That the wearing-power of steel in rails not only does not increase as hardness increases, but, on the contrary, diminishes; or, in other words, that a mild steel gives less loss of metal under the same service than a hard steel. These conclusions may be briefly stated in a single sentence—namely, in rails mild steel is not only less liable to fracture and disintegration in the track, but it also gives longer life, or wears more slowly under the same traffic; than harder steel. It is perhaps hardly necessary to add that by mild steel is meant steel

Jan 1, 1891

Jan 1, 1916

Jan 1, 1916

Jan 1, 1916

Jan 1, 1916

Jan 1, 1916

Jan 1, 1916

Jan 1, 1917

Jan 1, 1917

Jan 1, 1917

Jan 1, 1917

Jan 1, 1917

Jan 1, 1917

One Hundred Sixteenth Meeting of the Institute, Monday, Feb. 18, to Thursday, Feb. 21, inclusive, 1918. Committee on Arrangements J. E. JOHNSON, JR., Chairman BRADLEY STOUGHTON, Vice-Chairman A. R. LEDOUX J. V. N. DORR L. W. FRANCIS F. T. RUBIDGE G. D. VAN ARSDALE MRS. S. J. JENNINGS E. M. SHIPP RALPH W. DEACON ARTHUR L. WALKER The program for the New York Meeting, in February, 1918, as planned by the Committee on Arrangements at meetings in the middle of December, and therefore subject to slight alteration in detail, is as follows: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 18 9 a. m. to 5 p. m. Registration at Institute Headquarters. 10 a. In. Technical Sessions. 12.30 p. in. Luncheon at Engineering Societies' Building. 2 p. m. : Technical Sessions. 8.30 p. m. War Smoker or Patriotic Meeting. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19 10 a.m. Annual Business Meeting, followed by Technical Sessions.

Jan 1, 1918

The program for the Annual Meeting to be held in New York, Feb.17 to 20, 1919, inclusive, has been nearly completed. Besides the usual meetings for the reading of technical papers, the social features are being given special attention. They will probably embody the following: On Monday evening, a lecture by one of our fighting airplane pilots, to be illustrated by lantern slides and moving pictures. To this entertainment the ladies will be invited, as well as members. On Tuesday evening, a Smoker at which some very startling features are promised for the entertainment of members. On Wednesday evening, the usual banquet, at which it is hoped to have some very interesting speakers. The usual luncheons will be served in the Engineering Building and other features will be offered for the entertainment of the ladies during the day. No definite plans for the Thursday excursion have yet been formulated, though it is probable that something interesting will be offered the members.

Jan 12, 1918

In preparation for the 118th meeting, New York, Feb. 17 to 20, 1919, the following committees have been appointed: Committee on Arrangements ALLEN H. ROGERS, Chairman. W. S. Dickson, Secretary. J. E. JOHNSON, JR. F. T. RUBIDGE. H. C. PARMELEE. FOREST RUTHERFORD. P. G. SPILSBURY. Committee on Annual Dinner Committee on Luncheon F. T. RUBIDGE FOREST RUTHERFORD, Chairman. E. B. STURGIS. E. MALTBY SHIPP. Committee on Patriotic Meeting H. C. PARMELEE, Chairman

Jan 8, 1918

In preparation for the 119th meeting, New York, Feb. 17 to 20, 1919, the following committees have been appointed: Committee on Arrangements ALLEN H. ROGERS Chairman. NY. S. DICKSON, Secretary. J. E. JOHNSON, JR. F. T. RUBIDGE. P. G. SPILSBURY. H. C. PARMELEE. FOREST RUTHERFORD. Committee on Annual Dinner Committee on Luncheon F. T. RUBIDGE. FOREST RUTHERFORD, Chairman. E. B. STURGIS. E. MALTBY SHIPP Committee on Patriotic Meeting H. C. PARMELEE, Chairman.

Jan 11, 1918