Search Documents
Search Again
Search Again
Refine Search
Refine Search
- Relevance
- Most Recent
- Alphabetically
Sort by
- Relevance
- Most Recent
- Alphabetically
-
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Smith's Paper on the Garnet-Formations of the Chillagoe Copper-Field, North Queensland, Australia (see p. 467)
K. W. Turner, Sail Francisco, Cal. (communication to the Secretary*): The recent papers in the Transactions by Vogt,' Lindgren2 and Weed: on ore-deposits that have formed as a direct result of ig
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Sperry's Paper on the Sperry Vanning-Buddle (see p. 572)
Edwin A. SpeRry, Denver, Colo. (communication to the Secretary*) :—Since writing my former paper on this subject I have had several discussions concerning some of the statements contained therein, wit
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Spurr's Paper on A Consideration of Igneous Rocks and their Segregation or Differentiation its Related to the Occurrence of Ores (see p. 288)
Alexander N. Winchell, Butte, Mont. (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Spurr calls attention to the fact that an ore-deposit may be due to a succession of concentrations at different geological epo
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Stow's paper on Pressure-Fans vs. Exhaust-Fans (see p. 398)
R. V. Norris, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (communication to the Secretary*):—Mr. Stow's paper presents a series of arguments, numbered from 1 to 18, concerning the relative merits of four systems of collie
Jan 1, 1910
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Tay's Paper on the Bryan Mill as a Crusher and Amalgamator Compared with the Stamp Battery (see vol. xxix., pp. 776,1054)
Mr. Tays (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Wynne's criticism of my paper* brings forward a few points which are really important, and might properly have been considered in the original paper
Jan 1, 1902
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Van Liew's Paper on the Relative Elimination of Impurities in Bessemerizing Copper-Matte (see p. 418)
Allan Gibb, Mount Perry, Queensland, Australia (communication to the Secretary):—In drawing conclusions from his observations, Mr. Van Liew has apparently overlooked the reduction in weight that takes
Jan 1, 1904
-
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Watson's Paper on Geological Relations of the Manganese-Ore Deposits of Georgia (see p. 207)
Charles Catlett, Staunton, Virginia (communication to the Secretary*): I have had occasion to examine a few of the irondeposits in the immediate section of which Mr. Watson speaks, but have not had an
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Webster's Paper on Proposed Standard Specifications for Steel Forgings and Castings (see p. 170)
Gus C. Henning, New York City: In taking up the discussion of these specifications it is necessary that I give definitions of what I understand under the term " Specifications." There may be three kin
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Webster's Paper on Specifications for Steel Rails (see p. 449)
R. Trimble, Pittsburg, Pa (communication to the Secretary) : There are in the proposed specifications only two points on which I wish to comment at this time.
Jan 1, 1902
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Weed's Paper on Ore-Deposits Near Igneous Contacts (see p. 715)
In Mr. Weed's interesting paper, frequent reference is made to the Cananea copper-deposits, which are said to have been so vigorously exploited that they produced 14,000,000 Ib. of copper in 1901
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Weed's Paper on Section Across the Sierra Madre Occidental of Mexico (see Trans., xxxii., 444)
In traversing lately the Sierra Madre, west of Sail Pedro and Guanacevi, I estimated the topographic summit at several points, by aneroid barometer, at about 8,500 ft. Mr. Weed's measurements, 40
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Weed's Paper on Types of Copper-Deposits in the Southern Part of the United States (see vol. xxx., p. 449)
J. E. Stead, Middlesborough, England (communication to the author): Prof. Howe's valuable paper on cast-iron brings forward most prominently the correct explanation of the part played by combined
Jan 1, 1902
-
Discussions - Of Mr. White's Paper on The Equipment of a Laboratory for Metallurgical Chemistry in a Technical School (see Trans., xxxv., 971)
Charles H. White, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass, (communication to the Secretary*):—In answer to Mr. Jar-man's questions I am able to say that constant use (during term-time) since 1901 has
Jan 1, 1906
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Woo's Paper on Silver-Mining and Smelting in Mongolia (see p. 755)
MR. Woo's succinct description of the mining and smelting of silver-lead in Mongolia, with the roasting-and-reduction process and cupellation, has much interest as a picture of methods that not o
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Woodworth's Paper on the History and Conditions of Mining in the Richmond Coal-Basin (see p. 477)
Ware B. Gay, Richmond, Va.: Having followed the remarks of Prof. Woodworth with great interest, especially his suggestions for drilling in the part of the coal-field on the south side of the James riv
Jan 1, 1902
-
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Wright’s Paper on Metal-Losses in Copper-Slags (see Trans., xl., 492)
J. Parke Channing, New York, N. Y. (communication tb the Secretary*):—Mr. Wright, in his introductory paragraph, says: "It is commonly believed by metallurgists that in copper-smelting, the copp
Jan 1, 1911
-
Discussions - Of Mr. York's Paper on Improvements in Rolling Iron and Steel (see p. 859)
Robert W. Hunt, Chicago, Ill.:—It has been my good fortune to know of this development of Mr. York's for some time, and I think he will permit me to say that this is not the first demonstration t
Jan 1, 1907